User talk:Arifbehapiee

Welcome!

Hello, Arifbehapiee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, Jetstreamer Talk 16:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)}} Getting started Wikipedia's five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Notability • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content The community Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

Kelly Clarkson

Your formatting on Kelly Clarkson is improper in many ways; we do not write things as "No. 1" as that is NOT encyclopedic material; it should be written out as "number one" as per the website's MOS on years and numbers, all numbers nine and below should be written out in full stature, as such, all words should be fully written out in non-fan format. Also, song titles receive quotations, which album titles are italized; and be aware of WP:OVERLINK when editing, as you've violated this on several occasions. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 15:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Piece by Piece (Kelly Clarkson album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 18:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fifth Harmony at the 2015 People's Choice Award.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fifth Harmony at the 2015 People's Choice Award.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 10:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Reflection (Fifth Harmony album). Consider this your final warning on adding original research to articles. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 00:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm ^{we ♥ our hive} 15:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Reflection (Fifth Harmony album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 01:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Fifth Harmony at the Latin Billboard Awards.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fifth Harmony at the Latin Billboard Awards.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Worth It Album Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Worth It Album Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Reflection (Fifth Harmony album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop it with your addition of original research. You'll end up receiving a long-term, potentially permanent block. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 16:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Repeated addition(s) of unsourced sales

Please do not continue to add unsourced sales statements to the article Reflection (Fifth Harmony album). I've seen that you have been reverted by not only myself, but by Livelikemusic and Iknow23. You must provide reliable sources if adding such statements. If you continue, you may end up being reported and blocked for contributing in this manner. IPadPerson (talk) 19:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 21:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Dinah Jane Hansen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dinah Jane Hansen.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop.

I've seen that you have re-added the original research back into the articles Reflection (Fifth Harmony album) and Fifth Harmony after you have been reprimanded multiple times by myself and two other users to stop. If you continue, you may be blocked without further warning. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

ANI Report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 00:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Hello ,Drmies I would just like to point out how these three users , , —livelikemusic , and iPadperson have been continuously bullying Arifbehapiee . These users have been continuously reverting edits which are not theirs , assuming that edits that are not from them are not valid. For example, when 'Worth It' , a Fifth Harmony song peaked at number 21 on the Billboard Hot 100 , —livelikemusic changed it to number 34 , assuming that it did not peak at number 34 even though the source provided under chart history DOES prove it peaked at number 21 . This user has done this many times , not looking at the source and continuing to revert edits . Additionally , Billboard have confirmed that they have sold more than 1.5 million singles , with three CERTIFIED Gold singles. However , —Iknow23 removed that information , assuming its incorrect and not valid when it is valid in every way. Sales information have been provided by hitsdailydouble.com under sales and streaming, a chart with sales information that REFRESHES every week. I have given my sources for every sales statement but these three users have continuously removed this information when it is in fact correct and valid. This includes iPadPerson ignoring me when I gave my reason for these sales statement under his/her talkpage , including iPadPerson using vulgar language against me ,asking me to stop adding "bullshit" statements which I felt was extremely unprofessional . These three users are trying to paint me as a disruptive vandal but when —Iknow23 told me that single sales under kworb.net/cc/ustotals.html was not valid , I listened and did revert my sales statement for single sales. —Iknow23's claim that SPECIFIC WP:MOS explanations are frequently given and ignored is NOT true as I reverted that particular sales statement . —livelikemusic also claimed that the United States iTunes chart is not relevant but who is he to deem the chart not relevant? Lastly, the album has indeed spent 14 weeks in the Top 50 of the Billboard 200 . These three users claim it is wrong but I invite them to check the Billboard 200 right now and see that it is indeed at number 34, additionally , they can check previous weeks of the Billboard 200 (the full chart) and they will find the album never left the Top 50. The addition of the Worth It album cover which has been confirmed as the OFFICIAL album cover was also reverted by —livelikemusic , claiming it is not official when it has been used in the official fifth harmony website. I have left messages on —livelikemusic's talkpage to try and explain to him/her that my edits are valid but he/she has just simply removed my messages , refusing to acknowledge my reasons at all. These users have been continuously reverting my edits , in an attempt to place their power over new/inexperienced users but I hope you will see their own true colours and how they themselves have been disruptively reverting edits by other users , only allowing their own edits and claiming that those who revert their edits are disruptive vandals. I hope you will take a fair and neutral standpoint on this and listen to my reasons and take an objective view on this , thank you. I will also not be surprised if these users attempt to remove this message as this is what they have been doing consistently. As a fair editor , I hope you will do the right thing as I believe I have been wrongfully accused of disruptive editing. Thank you. 222.165.98.116 (talk) 06:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC) ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arifbehapiee, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

IPadPerson (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Mike V • Talk 19:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)