User talk:Aries Primal

May 2017

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Taiji (musician), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Morriganjapaneseband.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Morriganjapaneseband.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morrigan (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no independent references. This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morrigan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Morrigan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aries Primal! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding our IRC conversation

I'm sorry that I had to leave due to real-life issues; if you don't have the time to wait in the channel until a volunteer can answer your question, you may prefer the help resources on Wikipedia itself, for example the Teahouse or the Articles for creation help desk. When you ask a question in those places, you can check a few hours later whether there's an answer; you don't have to be around continuously.

Regarding the sources you asked about, Jrock News calls itself a "blog", which generally indicates a lack of editorial oversight. That what staff they have is entirely pseudonymous doesn't inspire confidence either. I doubt it would qualify as a reliable source. I also doubt that Jrock News is "big media in Japan" since it's written in English and says its goal is "to provide up to date news to Jrock fans around over the world" - it's clearly not written for a Japanese audience. The piece in question was written by one of the editors themselves, so it's effectively self-published. It also does not represent any independent reporting about the band; it merely duplicates information taken from an agency's Twitter account. If I understand the content summary of Visualist Magazine correctly, they have photos about Morrigan - and nothing but photos. Since a Wikipedia article must summarize what reliable sources that are independent of the subject have reported about it, that's not helpful: There's nothing for us to summarize. Huon (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Morriganjpn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Morriganjpn.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]