User talk:ArielNow

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Aurora Prince (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 02:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArielNow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please could somebody lift this block as soon as possible. I have not been using multiple accounts illigitimately or for any other ill purpose, as a view of editing history here will no doube show anyone who reads it carefully. All of my edits have been in excellent faith and in accordance with Wikipedia policy and guidelines, yet for unexplained reasons have been reverted and my account blocked with the insinutation that I have been trying to vandalise pages. As anyone who looks through will edit history will be able to see very clearly, this is absolutely not the case. I would very much appreciate if someone could get back to me as soon as possible. Many thanks, ArielNow. ArielNow (talk) 14:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but you may not simply avoid your previous blocks and continue editing. You will need to log into your primary account and address the issues there. Kuru (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please supply username of primary account that should be logged into and will endeavour to do this. Otherwise there is no choice but to make new accounts and/or move IP addresses until this admin and and user problem is.ArielNow (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArielNow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block was placed for no legitimate reason. Reason given was because of suspicion on behalf of admin that this account was created for vandalism. Evidence of edits will show this to be most definitely not the case. The IP block prevents editing from any device or location within the given IP range. Edits were made to improve pages and suspicion is unecessary and unfounded as no evidence was supplied. ArielNow (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you propose above is block evasion and is itself blockable. In fact, that's what this account is blocked for. You should know what your original account was. Huon (talk) 19:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Um, thanks, but you did not address any of the issues I raised. Ie, the reasons behind random blocks placed on my account with nothing more than curious "suspicion" on the behalf of various "admins". The "Aurora Prince" account has nothing to do with me, and thus there is no legitimate reason for placing these blocks. Can someone please address this issue properly for me? Thank you.ArielNow (talk) 19:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Which accounts have you used previously? Kuru (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]