User talk:Arham Tanveer

Welcome!

Hello, Arham Tanveer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lone boatman (talk) 10:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Walkman DD Series) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Walkman DD Series, Arham Tanveer!

Wikipedia editor Crow just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

References are needed please. Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment on Crow's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Arham Tanveer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Teague Egan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It's fairly obvious you have some sort of relationship with Teague Egan and/or Olive Writing Hub's pay-for-a-Wikipedia-article service. As i told the other obviously connected user in this case, now would be a good time to start being honest. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand the guidelines of Wikipedia I do not have any interest in this page nor I am connected with this person anyway I like to contribute in Wikipedia in my free time this was my total interes I did notice the issues raise and I don't want to contribute anything to this page any further until this issue is being resolved

I do understand the guidelines of Wikipedia I do not have any interest in this page nor I am connected with this person anyway I like to contribute in Wikipedia in my free time this was my total interes I did notice the issues raise and I don't want to contribute anything to this page any further until this issue is being resolved Arham Tanveer (talk) 01:11, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Because it would be a pretty amazing coincidence that you chose to move this out of draft space and into article space seven minutes after it was created by an obvious paid editor. So, you would ask that we believe that by mere coincidence you and this other person you have no association with suddenly became interested in writing about the exact same perosn within the same ten-minute period? Are you sure that's what you meant to say?

It seems more likely to me that either you are the exact same person, or that person asked around for a confirmed user to move the page for them. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arham Tanveer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mz7 (talk) 20:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issue

I have no connnection with anyone of them just so you know it is not my first time working on any article and helping the community furthermore I myself a Pakistani guy and Yesterday I searched for the company who is creating that which is in New york USA and I know you would come up a theory that they either pay me or ask me to do that but I am assistant vice president for a software engineering company so money is not a problem for me as far as your concern I was searching for 1 record company of this guy and was trying to create a page saw the page therefore I moved it after reviewing the content and as a senior contributor it is something I can do Arham Tanveer (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would again advise you to reconsider honesty as your story is completely unbelievable.

But even if anyone did believe it, here's what you have done so far on this project:

created a page on a valid subject, but that page had a very obvious point of view problem, and no appropriate sources and had to be basically completely rewritten by others to make it comply without most basic content policies.
Created another article on a valid topic, Walkman DD Series, but you didn't actually write that article, it was a copyright violation in its entirety and again, had to be compleely redone by others to make it acceptable.
<nothing for five years>
And then yesterday, you used your autoconfirmed status to help an obvious paid editor move a page out of draftspace, claiming you "reviewed the content" when in reality it had only even existed for a few minutes.

Not a very impressive record, it's arguable that you should be blocked even if your version of recent events was remotely believable, which again, it isn't. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock|1= Dear concern, I do apologize for the recent mistake that I made that I didn't check into the creator of the page before moving it and also start making changes, my sole purpose of doing that to help the community however now I know what were my mistakes furthermore I do not have multiple accounts however I use different devices in my office, university and home to login into my account which may be the cause of this problem as all those devices are share with different people but yet I take complete ownership of my mistakes and promise not to do anything like this in future. Awaiting your prompt response. [[User:Arham Tanveer|Arham Tanveer]] ([[User talk:Arham Tanveer#top|talk]]) 22:22, 26 October 2019 (UTC)}}

I have properly reformatted this unblock request. Mz7 (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arham Tanveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

dear concern, I do apologize for the recent mistakes that I made I wouldn't have go to any article and make it publish also I open my account on different devices which may be the cause of showing I have multiple account which to be honest I don't yet it is sole coincidence I endes up on that page but now I know I wouldnt have moved that page and also not make edits on that also I would like to clarify that I don't have any connection with that page creator nor the person who is the page about I live in Karachi, Pakistan and I don't have any intentions to violate the policy of wikipedia I recently regained the access to my account I was hype to contribute which is total reason I made these changes, please unblockmy account and I promise I won't make these mistakes again, thanks

Decline reason:

This was no coincidence. Your abuse of multiple accounts is established. Your abuse of our terms of use (WP:COI and WP:PAID and WP:PROMO) is established. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla, please provide me with evidence to support your reason like Ip addresses, location traking or any computerized way to recheck your assumptions it is cruel to block me because I am from Karachi Pakistan it is not a way to support a community Arham Tanveer (talk) 22:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla your reasons

Please provide me an evidence to support your issue with me to have multiple accounts along with a solid prove to support your reason to decline, if you are unable to provide me any significant prove then advise me how can you justify your thoughts. I am referring to solid evidence please Arham Tanveer (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arham Tanveer/Archive. A tool called checkuser was used. Exact results are not published on wiki to protect your privacy. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but you have to understand that many people can use a same IP ADDRESS which doesn't mean all are connected however I do understand all of your points but I personally request as a old member of the community to reconsider the blocking and give me a chance to follow wikipedia policies and help the community with my knowledge and I promise I will make sure I wouldn't make any mistakes in future.