User talk:Arguecat3
June 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Magibon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Magibon constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Magibon. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fugu Alienking (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Eh, you kids have too much free time on your hands! Gail (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
This is your LAST WARNING, per edits like this made to Magibon. More disruptive edits of that nature mean you WILL be blocked. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 17:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of Arguecat4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Magibon. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)