User talk:Argh6262

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of CaptainHog (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Argh6262 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just pointed out a typo though. What's the matter with that? Argh6262 (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You know perfectly well. You aren't welcome to evade your block. Yamla (talk) 21:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well how am I expected to learn from my "mistakes" if I'm blocked forever? I'm actually trying my best this time I fucking swear. Argh6262 (talk) 00:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You start by staying away for at least six months. Zero edits during that time. No new accounts. Then, after six months, you do an unblock request on your original account, explaining the situation and giving us reason to believe you'll never again engage in sockpuppetry or your original abusive behaviour. It's not a guarantee you'll be unblocked after six months, mind you; given your history, you'll have a high bar to reach, to convince us to unblock you. Each time you set up a new account, you provide even more strong evidence for us to be sure it would be inappropriate to ever allow you back. --Yamla (talk) 17:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]