Jump to content

User talk:Arfisk/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RfC: Should this article be deleted?

[edit]

This article is currently under consideration for deletion (reasons: N, RS, COI, RESUME.). At the time this section was added, the discussion stood at one comment for deletion, and one against. Further comment on the article's merit (or lack) would be appreciated. Arfisk (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional material

[edit]

List any suggestions for additional material here (with refs). Arfisk (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(To avoid excessive clutter, remove material that has been added. Note links that have been rejected, so they aren't inadvertently re-inserted.) Arfisk (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biography

[edit]

This page is currently under review for deletion. One current criticism is that the article currently reads like a resume rather than a biography. Fair point, although I would suggest a person is made 'notable' more by their body of work than how they live. That discussion is being had elsewhere. Meanwhile, a Biography section would be worthwhile... when references that meet [WP:BLP] guidelines can be found. Arfisk (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Projects

[edit]

Cascio's work in transhuman space should be mentioned, since two publications are listed. Good place to add Humanist contributions in general. Arfisk (talk) 12:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Online reference links to be added (remove as they are added):

There should be a separate section for Essay listings. Arfisk (talk) 05:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. However, essay listings look a bit dry, and really only duplicate the reference section. Suggest a rewrite as descriptive sentences summarising the points of each article. Arfisk (talk) 04:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Publications

[edit]

Superstruct

[edit]

Quality improvements

[edit]

Biography

[edit]

List suggestions to improve biography quality here. Arfisk (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality criteria suggests the content is at 'Start' level: current references being valid and reliable. More descriptive content would round the article up. Arfisk (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once additional references are included, consider what's needed to raise to 'c' level (Incidentally, I realise this is currently a one man show, and I won't doing any boosting without seeking other opinions.). Arfisk (talk) 23:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Views

[edit]

List suggestions to improve Alternate View quality here. Arfisk (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this Article fits the criteria for this Classification. The Subject is a forecaster, who describes future scenarios based on current social/technological trends. He may come up with some surprising predictions, but that doesn't necessarily mean he espouses 'alternate' views. Will reconsider when more content is added. Arfisk (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The 'Humanist' project would be more appropriate but, again, is it truly relevant? Arfisk (talk) 23:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Environment

[edit]

List suggestions to improve Environment quality here. Arfisk (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Importance Rating

[edit]

Alternate views

[edit]

Assess importance to this Project. Arfisk (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Environment

[edit]

Assess importance to this Project. Arfisk (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability issues

[edit]

I have added two notable citation sources which, I think, should be sufficient to establish notability of the Subject. Unless there are objections, I will remove the tag in a couple of days. Arfisk (talk) 04:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it seems acceptable to remove the tag now. I daresay I'll hear about it if not! Arfisk (talk) 08:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

[edit]

How do you pronounce his name? --JWB (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]