User talk:Arenrules777

December 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Genocides in history worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 04:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khojaly Massacre ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 23:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Javakhk Autonomous Republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javakhk Autonomous Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javakhk Autonomous Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cities and towns during the Syrian civil war may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Armenian National Constitution. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Unexplained reverts are disruptive. Drmies (talk) 01:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing unconstructive about my edits. I am adding the wording of the actual constitution so people can better understand the powers/rights granted and give people a better insight into Ottoman Armenian life. Please refrain from removing my edits. Arenrules777 (talk) 01:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong: reverting someone without even explaining why is disruptive. Second, we DON'T put stuff like that in our articles, and certainly not at that length. "People can better understand"--they can understand that from WikiSource. Please don't reinstate that. Drmies (talk) 01:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to want to drop the entire text of the constitution in there, but that is not what we are here for; we are an encyclopedia. Try WikiSource. Drmies (talk) 01:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]