User talk:Arenaross

Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing.--Drat (Talk) 08:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I jumped the gun with my warning, it's just that I've had to deal with numerous different IP users and one or two regirstered (IIRC), mass-adding links to the IDGB site. The two particular pages you linked have little to no useful info.--Drat (Talk) 08:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your messages. The dev quote you have is from the official 2K press release. It'd be best practice to simply link that in the article if the info was used; the X360/GFW exclusivity is already mentioned and cited to 1up.com anyway.--Drat (Talk) 09:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page The Hobbit do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 12:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Drat (Talk) 07:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the time or inclination to check every link in an article. There's nothing stopping you from removing a Mobygames link if you think there's not enough info to justify a link. Some, if reviewing your talk and edits, could perceive it as a disruption to make a point though. Mind you, I find it difficult to believe that a Mobygames page would have less info than an equivalent page from your site.--Drat (Talk) 09:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Each page I've checked on your site has a pittance of useful information. If there is anything useful, it's covered in more detail in better known sites. Not to mention, I've developed a bit of a nose for spam in my time here. There are several suggestions you should read, to help avoid it looking like you have a conflict of interest.--Drat (Talk) 09:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]