User talk:ArenaRock

User:Xnux

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Xnux may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.--The Fifth Horseman 09:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Personal Attacks

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:ArenaRock. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --The Fifth Horseman 06:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I was under the impression that I could put whatever I wanted on my page, including changing your name. Apparently I was wrong. I just felt I should mention this, but you spelled attacks wrong, adding an extra s at the end.---- ArenaRock (talk) 22:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, I read this article here, and it specifically recommends not getting rid of personal attacks on other people's talk pages. So it stands, I'm putting it back up. ---- ArenaRock (talk) 22:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable. It specifically says "Don't edit others' comments, including signatures". --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 14:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 14:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 14:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Fifth Horseman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Fifth Horseman was changed by ArenaRock (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-13T18:57:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:The Rolling Stones. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sssoul (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edits you made to Template:John Entwistle, Template:Tesla and Template:Mercyful Fate. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the ones you made to Template:Paul Rodgers, Template:David Coverdale and Template:Obscure/doc. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:The Fifth Horseman, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 10:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Jack_Block. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Poltair (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Magic Dance Hat

A tag has been placed on Magic Dance Hat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 21:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Magic Dance Hat

A tag has been placed on Magic Dance Hat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 21:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]