User talk:Archie Mitchell

Welcome!

Hello, Archie Mitchell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Succession boxes

Hi. If you read WP:MOSFICT, as User:AnemoneProjectors quoted in his removal of the succession boxes, it states: "succession boxes should not be used to describe in-universe relationships in articles about fictional entities". He's quite right in removing them, though there is a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject EastEnders#Succession boxes which you're more than welcome to join in with. Please refrain from making personal attacks in your edit summaries. Thank you. Frickative 22:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GLaDOS (talk) 23:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please refrain from attacking other contributors, as you did with this edit to Conservative Party (UK). Continued personal attacks may lead to being blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Thank you. GLaDOS (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to Template:Thatcherism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. GLaDOS (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute

I am not an administrator and have no blocking privileges, however you can read over the information on the following links which are designed to resolve conflicts on Wikipedia.

Dispute resolution
Request for comment

Hope this helps GLaDOS (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Template: Thatcherism. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This edit summary [1] is not acceptable, particularly at the end. Please discuss the matter on the talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 23:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Archie Mitchell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I swear I am innocent of vandalism, sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Just because of correlating views you have no right to block me! Bastin is a sockpuppeteer! I know it. Outside the virtual world I know Bastin. He's a spin doctor! Believe me! We have got to negotiate properly!

Decline reason:

Views that exactly correlate with those of a blocked editor, both in cotnent and chronology. WP:DUCK seems pretty clear. Your views of other editors in real life, including whether you know them or what their occupation is, are irrelevant to this unblock request.Euryalus (talk) 07:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Archie Mitchell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thats making a generalization. There are many editors with correlating views. Thats just harsh and discriminative. Bastin breaks the rules. He is arrogant, insulting and manipulative and he lies. He breaks ownership rules because he is taking over the page. I think that he should also get blocked if I get blocked. In addition, alot of what I said wasn't vandalism! 1) There are Powellites in the Tory Party 2) There is no such thing as Thatcherite libertarianism if you find a reference to that then fine 3) Powell, Cameron, Sir Denis Thatcher, Reagan are Thatcherites. Reagan is the American version. But Murdoch is Blairite and he is American. David Cameron is Thatcherite because he is a partisan of Thatcher and has been known as "Thatcherite in Blairite clothing". Denis Thatcher is a Thatcherite. He was very defensive of his wife's beliefs and supported them. In fact he was more rightwing. Thatcher was centred on economy and Powell did support her economic beliefs so in some respects he is a Thatcherite. If you think I have caused umbrage I ask any other administrator to listen to me plea with sincerety. I do not need to be guided or mentored. Please!

Decline reason:

You're not gonna *get* an administrator to listen to you sincerely so long as you keep personally attacking other editors (including accusations sans evidence). Declined. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 05:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.