Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Irving E. Carlyle instead.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please review the article and see whether any information in this draft can be added to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irving E. Carlyle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irving E. Carlyle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Archicam!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Archicam! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Basmul1 (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Archicam. Carlyle is indeed an important (and underrated) figure in North Carolina history. However, considering the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline, it is strongly recommended that you do not directly edit the article yourself if you are closely related to Carlyle. I was going to get around to improving it, but I got tied up with other things. I mass reverted your edits because a lot of the language was simply not neutral like we need it to be, some of it wasn't sourced, and some of it used a less-than-stellar source. As for what you can do in light of your conflict of interest, I suggest that you post your suggested improvements for the article on its talk page. That way myself and other editors can review it and incorporate what you provide in a manner that ensures a neutral point of view is maintained. Another thing you could do, if possible, is find a high quality family photo of Carlyle and, if you're comfortable doing so, upload it to Wikipedia with a free license, as the current photo I added is rather low quality. I emphasize family photo, and specifically a photo that either you hold the rights to or a family member holds the rights to that would give you permission to post it on Wikipedia, as a professional portrait or an image taken by a journalist is likely to have a copyright status which you cannot alter. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
