User talk:Archer7

I'm glad I could help. Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way. If you ever have any questions, feel free to ask. Joyous (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Compassion Over Killing

Yes, it can be moved. In fact, I've already done it for you. For more information, see Wikipedia:Page moves. I think people have to be registered for a certain amount of time, or have X number of edits before the "page move" tab becomes available, so I don't know if you have it yet or not. Joyous (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism by Archer7

If you continue to vandalise we will block you

Tangokiller 10:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Err, vandalism? You mean like you on Weather loach, By Design (disambiguation), Manchester United F.C. etc etc. I think everyone should look at your contributionsArcher7 10:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

we have to stop tangokiller what shall we do

shall we block himSquid 10:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great, but Tangokiller, please stop impersonating other users. You screwing up the server.Archer7 10:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to blockTangokillerBlocker 11:00, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i apolohize for the vandalism it wont happen again i promise you cool person

Edit warring

Hi, Archer, it's nice to see you're still around. You might visit this page for some suggestions. Joyous | Talk 02:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good-faith edits as vandalism

Please be more careful about what you call "vandalism". In particular, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asian_fetish&diff=31089458&oldid=31088640 this] revert was to a good-faith edit that the user mentioned on the article's talk page beforehand. The editor who had made those changes, and who has since registered an account as User:OneViewHere, was pretty disappointed about that revert. --Idont Havaname 02:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, probably not most of them, but certainly a sizable portion of them. I've been voting on WP:RfA for several months and have noticed some patterns in the nominations; a lot of experienced RC patrollers (i.e. usually several thousand edits, and several months here) get nominated for adminship. --Idont Havaname 20:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and just to let you know, in response to your recent message at Talk:Asian fetish - I'm not an admin. I guess sometimes it can be misleading since I've been here a while. --Idont Havaname 04:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jordanhatch

OK, I deleted all prior versions of this user page which had his friend's full name. The older versions may still be accessible by admins, but that's probably a very low risk. Let me know if you need additional help. Owen× ☎ 19:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Monitoring

Are you monitoring my contributions? My user page is under construction and if you copy the codes, well it'll lack originality. --XenoNeon 13:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:DaGizza's monobook.js

Done. Owen× ☎ 00:03, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for the help

For helping get out of an awful situation. Thanks for all your support! **Da Gizza** ^{Chat (c)} 04:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

wpspam invite

Hey there! I saw you reverting or removing linkspam. Thanks! If you're interested, come visit us in Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam so we can work together in our efforts to clean spam from Wikipedia. --Perfecto 14:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

river thames

give us 10 facts Rorydude 13:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the article by clicking here.

y

y (unsigned comment by Rorydude)

hi

hi (unsigned comment by Rorydude)

IRC access

Hey. Sorry about the kick, I confused you with another user. We changed the way we confirm users, and it seems the user who converted the lists accidentally skipped your name. I added you to the list, and you should be auto-voiced next time to join #wikipedia-en-vandalism. Sorry about that. :) // Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 10:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Guinea Pigs

I have made our vandal aware of his situation, I hope he stops. IP: 24.218.205.40 -- 17:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Actually the comment above was me. Eptalon 17:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

simple:User_talk:Archer7

Some Leyland Info...

Hi Archer7,

I have been updating some pages from around the local area, and I was wondering if you had any information about it. Maybe you could improve some of my articles - see my user page.

Did you know that XenoNeon left?

Jordanhatch 21:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

XenoNeon: The Truth

I spoke to XenoNeon today at school, and he told me that he will be coming back in a few weeks under a new username. I'm not too sure how long it will be, but he said that he was just spending a bit more time relaxing for a bit then he will "get back into it".

Jordanhatch 19:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fat Joe Vandalism?

I've never even seen that entry in my life, the only entry I've edited is my university.

152.71.94.174 15:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your nominations of 3 .ogg files on Miscellany for deletion

I have speedy closed your nominations because MfD is not the place to request for media files to be deleted. Instead, please nominate them for deletion at Images and media for deletion instead. Thanks! Kimchi.sg 13:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Archer7! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. fetofs ^Hello! 12:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mp3 Link

No - I have no problems with the link being removed (altough I thought short samples from tracks were legal? I could be wrong, it wasn't the entire song of any of the tracks featured) - but it did prove my point with Guns and Roses and Neon Tiger. --ACE Spark 13:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Would OGG be better, or would it just be worth it to just leave it at the talk page? (So people do not try to add an uncited tag again, which it has been proven?) --ACE Spark 13:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - at the talk page it is left then - Thanks for the chat! --ACE Spark 13:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look here

Look there, please, read the message and do whatever needs to be done. Tree bark (talk) 16:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vector says i have been vandalising

i don't think i was - i was reverting vandalism - you can looks at my contribibs if you want - they are @ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bendy - can you vouch for me as you are a friend - i did used to vandalise but who didn't but i have now stopped - if my reverting vandalism isn't done right could you tell me what i'mm doing wrong please

My RfA

Thank you very much for your support of my RfA!

Atlant 16:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's been a week now that I've been an administrator and I'd like to take this moment to once again thank everyone who supported my RfA, and to let you all know that I don't think I've screwed anything up yet so I hope I'm living up to everyone's expectations for me. But if I ever fall short of those expectations, I'd certainly welcome folks telling me about it!

Atlant 14:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is saying sorry to someone uncivil

All I did was say that I was sorry and asked him to apologize to. How is that rude. Please answer me on my talk page.--Sir james paul 16:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bye

I am leaving wikipedia. I will still be at simple wikipedia though. --Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio 01:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you so much for your help with that unpleasant incident over at Simple English, dear Archer! :) I've already registered an account there, so the matter is solved, thanks to you, Sean and Tdxiang. I'm sure you have lots of friends over here, but I hope there's room for one more in me ;) Thanks again, and see you around! Cheers, Phaedriel - 06:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben on Simple Wikipedia

This is a cross post to confirm that I'm EconomicsGuy on Simple.

I offer to co-mentor Ben. I'm EconomicsGuy on Enwiki and I along with Jeff encouraged Ben to create an account here. He's a good editor who got into a whole lot of trouble on Enwiki but from my conversations with him I trust him and will be available for assistance if required. Ultimately it's up to Ben if he wants my help here in addition to Jeff's mentorship but this community should rest assured that Ben is being watched closely. From my e-mail conversations with him he understands the terms completely. I'm available to answer any questions you might have. EconomicsGuy (talk) 06:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saynoscreenshot.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Saynoscreenshot.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cok.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cok.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user:Rick Block on simple

Hi - I'm merging my accounts and noticed there was a vandal who registered as "Rick Block" on simple (and is permanently blocked). Can you rename that account (or something) so I can be myself everywhere? Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Info dojo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Info dojo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]