User talk:ArchaerhodopsinGuy

ArchaerhodopsinGuy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ArchaerhodopsinGuy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, ArchaerhodopsinGuy, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

March 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Microbial rhodopsin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford: I have reverted your reversion. Redundant reference information, which is defined elsewhere in the article was removed. There was no need for you to restore it - please check more carefully next time. My edit summary 'clean up ref' was self-explanatory. ArchaerhodopsinGuy (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)