User talk:Arbitrary username

This user has left the project.

?!

Assuming this is for real, I really, really hope your last user contributions don't indicate why. -Chinju 10:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came back here for one last time just to check that the above "left the project" message was still intact, when I saw your response. Even though I intended to make no further edits, I felt compelled to respond, just to set your mind at ease that my edits to Suicide methods (to which you seem to be referring) certainly do not imply any personal inclination in that direction.

Right, now that I have said that, I really am stopping editing. I now intend to visit this site only to read articles, so I do not expect to notice any messages left on talk pages. Goodbye and good luck.

83.145.108.71 21:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC) (Arbitrary username editing through some randomly chosen proxy)[reply]

Well, that's a relief. Sorry to hear you no longer intend to edit, but at least you're not abandoning Wikipedia entirely. -Chinju 22:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Waag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Waag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tristram Jones-Parry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tristram Jones-Parry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristram Jones-Parry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]