User talk:Arbabraja

Welcome

Hello, Arbabraja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Creamy!^Talk 18:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! When you add wikipedia links there is no need to put [http://en.wikipedia] links to other wikipedia links. Simply add the interwiki link like this Example. See, that's easier!

Thill Sharief

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thill Sharief, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Creamy!^Talk 19:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Thill Sharief has been reverted. Please do not remove content from pages without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Kerotan ^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 09:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Muhammad appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. BigDunc (talk) 12:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. You are not a administrator. You can't just put a padlock and say the page is protected. You are simply a user. You cannot lock or block users. Creamy!^Talk 21:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Honorifics

Salaam Alaykum. I was noticing your recent edits have included the honorific PBUH after mention of the Prophet. It bears noting, however, that while showing reverence for the Prophet is praiseworthy and good that it is inappropriate for a neutral encyclopedia article. I suggest reading the Manual of Style on Islam-related articles to get a better understanding of the standards and practices regarding these edits.

I hope you will take these things into consideration, as it is always good to have another dedicated contributor helping to improve and expand Islam-related articles. Thank you again! May you go in God's care. Peter Deer (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:3be1d5bc-ce3c-40e2-92b0-d2851c2f2654.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Arbabraja!
We thank you for uploading Image:3be1d5bc-ce3c-40e2-92b0-d2851c2f2654.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

It's not deleted! They're just trying to clean it up. There is no need to put georgaphical referrences inside the article as there IS a template for geographical coordinates. I will ask the Cleaning Comitee to clean up the article for full compliance with Wikipedia standards. That includes proper english vocabulary & grammar. So don't worry! It's going to be okay! :) --Creamy!^Talk 15:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And please try to avoid the use of the <br> tag in articles and also please sign your reply by clicking the signature button right of the forbidden W . --Creamy!^Talk 15:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Thill sharief.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Thill sharief.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 17:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Please don't remove the tags that i put on Thill Sharief. They're there for notability and guidelines. Please don't sign articles and use <br> tags. Another notice is to please provide a english or latin name equivalent of the plant names in that article. Because there seems to be major confusion , wikipedia cleaning team and typo teams are patroling pages and they tried to fix your article and yet you undo them. I tried to fix yours, so did User:GlassCobra. And still you revert them. Altough, i do believe there is no need to put the important people list on that article. --Creamy!^Talk 12:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]