User talk:Aprilman21

123456789

Roberto Firmino

Please follow WP:BRD. You were Bold in adding the information, I Reverted, and next step is for you to start a Discussion, to seek consensus on the matter. You should stop edit warring. Giant Snowman 20:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: You are the one who removed my content twice, I only brought back what I have written because I am not convinced with your reasons. Many times users like you can write any excuse to remove something. I questioned what would be included as a summary for his current season, you did not answer, you simply wrote "notability" needed. That term means nothing as it can be subjective as you like to use it to enforce your opinion. I do not like edit wars, but I highly recommend to keep the section until an independent article sums up his season. Aprilman21 (talk) 21:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you fail to understand how BRD works... Giant Snowman 06:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Utter shit

You can continue to not like my comments as much as you like, I will not change my opinion about WP:PROSELINE content. This is not a personal attack on you, but a comment about my opinion about the way the article was being presented. You can conflate the two in your mind if you like, but that is not how my comments were intended. Thanks. – Pee Jay 17:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay: You came to my talk page to write me that "You can conflate the two in your mind if you like", What the hell is wrong with you?! I noticed that you got a ban earlier for a couple of days, so I hope the next one would be indefinite. Users like you with their vulgarism won't stay for long! Aprilman21 (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look, if you don't understand that comments about content are not the same as comments about contributors, that's your problem. I've done nothing wrong here. – Pee Jay 17:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay: You removed my strike on the vulgar comment that you wrote on my talk page, then you claim that you did not use it as a personal attack! As I wrote earlier, your can apply that term to your overall contribution! I am sure that you won't stay for long, so I would not waste time writing someone like you. Aprilman21 (talk) 17:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, clearly you don't understand the difference between a personal attack and a criticism of content. If you're unable to separate the two, perhaps you shouldn't be participating in a forum where interpersonal interaction is necessary. – Pee Jay 23:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]