User talk:Appolodor din Damasc

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Appolodor din Damasc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can one explain me why my account was blocked? And who is this mikkalai and bonaparte anyway?

Decline reason:

I concur with Mikka, this is probably a sock of Bonaparte. Bonaparte and his sockpuppets have caused so much disruption in the same article over the same issue using so many different accounts that this has become a rather safe assumption. Only you know if you are Bonaparte or not: if you are actually an innocent new user, I'm sorry you had this experience... one disruptive user can really ruin things for a lot of innocent people. Mango juice^talk 18:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin: Please feel free ask the second opinion of long-term participants in the domain in Talk:Moldovan language and if unconvinced, feel free to unblock without talking to me (unless you want to teach me how I have to act). `'Míkka >t 23:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked me by saying 'suspected sock of bonaparte'. Can you explain me why I can edit any article I want? --Appolodor din Damasc (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]