User talk:AppearsTwinkling

AppearsTwinkling, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AppearsTwinkling! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Naara Rohit has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Naara Rohit was changed by AppearsTwinkling (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923268 on 2016-06-08T16:32:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sanjjanaa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Managerarc™^talk 21:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Sanjjanaa. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. - Managerarc™^talk 21:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Sanjjanaa Galrani. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. PLease stop this disruptive editing. You've been warned for pretty much everything and now you're disruptively moving pages. Any further disruptive edits and you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 07:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shena Bajaj. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Birthdates for living people must be attributed to reliable published sources per WP:BLPPRIVACY. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and this content contains grossly improper tone for an encyclopedia. For example, describing what an actor does to "enhance the fun factor" is a ridiculous thing to put in an encyclopedia. Further, the same content can be found here which strongly suggests that it was either plagiarized, or you're some sort of promoter trying to use Wikipedia as a forum for marketing. That's not going to be tolerated. Content must be written from a neutral point of view, content must be written in a proper encyclopedic tone, content must not be copied or even closely paraphrased from other sources, content must be properly sourced, etc. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, why did you create an article about Sheena Bajaj at Shena Bajaj, which appears to be a misspelling of her first name? It looks like a deliberate attempt to avoid scrutiny, as articles on Sheena Bajaj were previously deleted numerous times. I would appreciate an explanation, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As i did Sheena Bajaj as Shena Bajaj because the artile of Sheena Bajaj was redireted to Best of Luck nikki and Sheena Bajaj was not able to edit the source of article..we made the article change with the permission of Sheena Bajaj.we need to made her deatils know to public.if can plz make the sheena bajaj article for editing pursore to keep the full details of her... User:Appearstwinkling (talk) 10:19P.M, 22 July 2016 (IST) —Preceding undated comment added 16:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1) Why would you think that creating an article under the wrong spelling would somehow be of benefit to anyone? A better approach would have been to find an administrator and as them for advice, or if that was too difficult, going to the Help Desk to figure out what to do. Someone probably would have told you to create a draft article first or to go through our Articles for creation process.

2) "With the permission of Sheena Bajaj"? What permission? She doesn't own Wikipedia. Was she the one who told you to add content that was not of proper encyclopedic tone?

3) If you are paid to publish articles, you need to disclose you who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. An intuitive place to do that is on your user page. Also, if Sheena Bajaj is paying you, or if you are friends with her, you have a conflict of interest, and you are strongly discouraged from editing her article at all.

4) Wikipedia is not a forum for advertisement or promotion. Only subjects that are notable should be written about. Our general notability guideline can be found here. More specific notability criteria can be found at WP:NOTABILITY. If you are writing about actors, see WP:NACTOR. If you are writing about films, see WP:NFF. I've noticed that some of the film articles you've created don't properly establish when the film's principal photography began. That needs to be in the article and well sourced, as the lack of that information will result in the article being redirected or deleted. I recommend you add this information to those articles as soon as you can, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing problems

Unfortunately, there have been a number of problems with your editing in connection with Shena Bajaj and Bajaj Sheena. I see that some of those problems have already been mentioned above, including the fact that using Wikipedia to publicise or promote a subject (or, as you put it, "to made her deatils know to public") is unacceptable. I shall mention a few other points which you need to be aware of.

The contents of the articles were largely, in fact as far as I could see entirely, made up of pieces copied from other sources. This was almost certainly infringement of copyright law, and certainly infringement of Wikipedia's copyright policy, so the articles have been deleted.

Please don't move the contents of an article to another title by copying and pasting the contents, as this loses the editing history, which must be kept to comply with Wikipedia's copyright licensing terms.

You say that you could not edit the page Sheena Bajaj. That was because the page has been protected from editing because of repeated creations of the article following a discussion which led to the decision that the article was unsuitable for Wikipedia. Evading that protection by using a different page title is not acceptable. If you believe that there are new circumstances which make an article on the subject more suitable now than was the case at the time of the deletion discussion, then it may be possible to create a draft article at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, but just evading the page protection by using a different title is not the way to go about it.

I notice a striking number of similarities between your editing and that of an older account called "Sayyedmajidali". Were you the person who used that account? If not, what is your connection to the person who used it? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page move of Sanjjanaa

You were asked not to move Sanjjanaa to Sanjjanna Galrani by User:Managerarc at 21:17, 13 July 2016. You just moved it again. That page move is disputed. Please discuss it at the article's talk page if you want it moved.

Please understand that you may be blocked from editing if you persist with these disruptive edits. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vi Anand.jpg

Please tell us how you happen to have this photo of File:Vi Anand.jpg. Where did you get it? You state:

Source: Vi Anand
Author: Appears Twinkling
Permission: Vi Anand

Could you please explain? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. You've been warned multiple times for many things including page moves, now you've again moved a page to your preferred title after your prior move was reverted. To be unblocked you'll have to show that you understand and will abide by our policies.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 19:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is a reasonable block. AppearsTwinkling, I'd still like to know about that image. If you do not speak up, I will probably nominate it for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a copyvio Anna (this is from the Facebook page of the subject), like all other uploads from this account. —SpacemanSpiff 20:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly, Spaceman. Facebook is blocked where I am, so that's probably why Tineye didn't catch it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AppearsTwinkling (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i got to move the pages because of the Screen name of the celbrity or having the exact information so i had edited or moving of pages to another,and the image was keept for the identification of the celbrity,some of the people know them by the face value more than the name

Decline reason:

This does not address your copyright violations. Yamla (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AppearsTwinkling. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]