User talk:Apologeticone23
I'm not necessarily agreeing with you that all four parties should be shown on the infographic (of the Washington special election) but I am curious how you determined the order. Could you at least put the Democrat and Republican candidates first or some sort of order that isn't random? (Fshoutofdawater (talk) 23:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC))
- I just added them. I think the point needs to be made that there are no "major" parties, just qualified candidates. The ballot order will be determined the 13th of December. I think that whatever the order on the ballot is would be most appropriate.
- Okay well until then why don't you put the Democrat first (as this is the incumbant party) and the Republican second (the runner-up in the last election) and the other two based on the last election results or if no data just alphabetical order of the candidates. I think this is somewhat of a compromise because I know at least one other person doesn't want them there at all. (Fshoutofdawater (talk) 06:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC))
- That seems reasonable. I'll do it tomorrow.
- Okay well until then why don't you put the Democrat first (as this is the incumbant party) and the Republican second (the runner-up in the last election) and the other two based on the last election results or if no data just alphabetical order of the candidates. I think this is somewhat of a compromise because I know at least one other person doesn't want them there at all. (Fshoutofdawater (talk) 06:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC))