User talk:Apipattana

Kandace Krueger

Hi, "The deletion proposal reason is just only say all unsourced?"

No, it said "The article's notability is based on three beauty pageants, all of which unsourced", not all unsourced, just what she is notable for.

" I am objecting of the proposed deletion by Sciencefish because previously he proposed to deleting a article about Gabriela Isler and then now Kandace Krueger because he say that it is unsourced or lacks of reliable sources, but I think those articles that related to the Miss Universe Organization (including the Miss USA and Miss Teen USA pageants), or even related to a well-known notable beau..."

You are welcome to object to my reasons for individual articles, that's what the process allows. But at least practice what you preach and add some sources, not what they are related to. This is an encyclopaedia not a collection of articles with notability not backed by evidence. Sciencefish (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A full explanation about a objecting the deletion proposal is: The deletion proposal reason is just only say all unsourced? I am objecting of the proposed deletion by Sciencefish because he previously proposed to deleting a article about Gabriela Isler and then now Kandace Krueger because he say that it is unsourced or lacks of reliable sources, but I think those articles that related to the Miss Universe Organization (including the Miss USA and Miss Teen USA pageants), or even related to a well-known notable beauty pageants and especially the Big Four beauty pageants should be not deleted without a valid reasons not only say unsourced and didn't say that not meet the Wikipedia guidelines, but should be studying the policies about article notability on Wikipedia, considering a notable enough or might be not notable enough depending to Wikipedia guidelines. If necessary to deleting the article, may should be recommended to nominating the article deletion will be better, and should be given a valid reason to deleting that article, but depending on the editors that wants to keep or delete of that article. (In the edit summary comment it is limited the characters are typed to that section.) Apipattana (talk) 09:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Notability (beauty pageant participants), it is still notable for both articles about Gabriela Isler and Kandace Krueger. Apipattana (talk) 09:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]