User talk:Apfaq
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Peniel revival ministries.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Peniel revival ministries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Abraham Soman
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Abraham Soman, by Seattlenow (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Abraham Soman seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Abraham Soman, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Peniel Revival Ministries Inc and Category:4awindow
[edit]I have nominated Category:Peniel Revival Ministries Inc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Category:4awindow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. TCC (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Image issues
[edit]- Fair use rationale for Image:Jeep.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jeep.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
I have also deleted Image:PRM.jpg because it was corrupt (error message The image “http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/47/PRM.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.)-Andrew c [talk] 14:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD Nomination: Peniel Revival Ministries Inc
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Peniel Revival Ministries Inc meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peniel Revival Ministries Inc. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. -- Andrew c [talk] 14:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Your message
[edit]Even though the post was from an anonymous user, I'm assuming that you simply forgot to sign in. First of all, if you have a message for me, leave it on my talk page, not my user page. The talk page is made for messages, and it notifies you when someone has left a new one. Secondly, it is generally not good behavior to suggest what vote I should place in an AfD discussion- telling me about the discussion is fine, and encouraging me to vote is okay, but telling me to vote "keep" is not good. It seems that you are new here, so don't worry about it, but such behavior may cause you trouble later on.--C.Logan 18:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD deletion listing warning
[edit]In this edit, you deleted the AfD listing for Peniel Revival Ministries Inc. There is no reason for you to have made that edit, and doing so is considered harmful to the encyclopedia (i.e. vandalism). Please do not make disruptive edits such as that in the future or you may risk a temporary block. -Andrew c [talk] 14:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Peniel revival Ministries logo.gif)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Peniel revival Ministries logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jeep3.JPG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jeep3.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:RUMUN - 11-19-06 - CHURCHILL AND EBAY DID IT!!!!.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RUMUN - 11-19-06 - CHURCHILL AND EBAY DID IT!!!!.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Postdlf 03:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
The article Rho Chi Post, St. John's University has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Subject appears to be non-notable, uses only primary references and is not written from a NPOV, e.g. "The Vision" section
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smcg8374 (talk) 07:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)