User talk:Apatronoftruth

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregchilders (talk • contribs)

About the above

The "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" is part of every page here. He didn't add it. However, the warning was inappropriate (it is, under Wikipedia guidelines, a level 3 warning for someone who has already received level 1 and 2 warnings.

It seems clear there are issues with the article, and I will arrange to have other experienced Wikipedia editors take a look at it shortly. I have also warned the other editor about removing comments from the article Talk page. That is quite forbidden. Fan-1967 15:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification and your assistance in this matter.

Apatronoftruth 01:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just another troll

Apatronoftruth is nothing more than a coward hiding behind an anonymous alias.

Gregchilders 03:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Like anyone cares what Gregchilders thinks.

Apatronoftruth 03:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you do

Or else you wouldn't spend your entire weekend editing a single article on Wikipedia.

Gregchilders 04:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Childers, please don't think that this debate is any indication of your importance. This started as an attempt to correct your dishonesty. At this point, your insistance that there is a performance troupe and your avoidance of answering questions is just further showing, to all the local and national performers, the type person you really are, as opposed to the person you portray online.

I hope you realize that all of this could have been avoided by simply by admitting that there is no performance troupe. I still cannot fathom why you insist that there is.

Do you care to answer why you still insist there is a performance troupe?

Apatronoftruth 04:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest edits

Factual information only should go in the article. Commentary and opinions should be confined to the article Talk page. Fan-1967 21:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It was not I who has made multiple edits to the entry today. While I want to have the truth reflected in the article, I know that the discussion page is where the questions edited in the entry "E.S.Roberts" belongs.

Apatronoftruth 23:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Memphis Improvisational Theatre

Your edit to Memphis Improvisational Theatre is in violation of WP:3RR. Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warning. Seeing as Mr. Childers seems to have given up, and thereby has left me with nothing to correct, I await the decision on the fate of the entry. I apologize for my violation. I now have read WP:3RR and understand the rules.

Again, I am sorry for the violation of the 3RR rule.

Apatronoftruth 03:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Pop by my talk page if you have any questions or comments! Cheers, Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:LiveatNine.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:LiveatNine.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Per AfD on The Wiseguys, an 8 to 7 to delete is not a consensus and shows only a very weak support for deletion. It's not as much as a vote for deletion but as it is a discussion. If no strong consensus can be achieved, it should be represented within a reasonable amount of time, per policy, so that another discussion can ensue. Sorry to see it go, but some admins simply do not see it in a fair light. Perhaps try creating a more overall comedy page for Memphis and going from there. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From The Wiseguys

Lawcomic has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

You deserve a smiley face for your hard work in trying to save The Wiseguys page! Enjoy!