User talk:Anupamkapil

This is Anupamkapil's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Desimartini (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Desimartini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Desimartini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anupamkapil! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 12:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission and about sourcing

Greetings. Your submission was declined because you used to much of primary sources. You could source from mainstream publications, major magazines, newspapers and/or books. Primary sources e.g. homepages, official websites and websites that are closely related to the topic are best to be avoided. For your case, Alexa and profit.ndtv would be primary sources which are not considered to be reliable sources. For a much thorough guide, click on the blue hyperlinks on the declination banner on your submission page. Cheers. EROS ^message 14:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

203.145.175.2 (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About your submission Draft:Desimartini

Third party sources are the best kind of sources for Wikipedia articles. They consist of mainstream publications, major business magazines, newspapers and even books. Moreover, sources are required to be independent, that is to be unrelated to the source. Although you sourced from major business websites like Blommberg and Finance Yahoo, they are not articles but company reports. It grieves me to say that articles would be a better choice, although if no options left, they could be used as sources only as the last resort. Many of your sources still need improvement. For (5), there is only a small paragraph and no meaty coverage. Articles with only passing mentions (like no.5) are best to be excluded. Contrary to these, no. (7) is a good source. It is from Hindu Times and a deep coverage given to the company. Such articles are the best suited as sources for articles. If you cannot find any in English, do not hesitate to insert foreign language sources. It can be in the local language. The English Wikipedia does welcome and accept non-English sources as reference. Some articles on Wikipedia are in fact wholly sourced with foreign language sources. That won't be a problem. Cheers. EROS ^message 15:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Desimartini (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at [[:HT Media]]. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficient evidence of independent notability. [1] has no byline and so is not clearly WP:RELIABLE. [2] is arguably WP:ROUTINE business coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Desimartini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Desimartini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Desimartini

Hello, Anupamkapil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Desimartini".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 01:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]