User talk:Antonio V

U.S. congressional apportionment

Thanks for updating that! it will be helpful for when I attempt my overhaul of that article sometime in the next 14 months. Check out the talk page for my outline and what I hope to do with the page. Foofighter20x (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary table widths

It may look better in your browser on your monitor, but it doesn't on mine. Please don't assume that everyone sees every web page exactly the same way you do. It just isn't true. Rklear (talk) 22:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

verifiability, not truth

Please check out the Wikipedia policy WP:VERIFY before you remove sources and make comments like "An unsourced true sentence is better that a sourced false sentence". Thank you Hekerui (talk) 18:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for leaving a note on my talkpage. If you felt attacked by my message pointing out the policy, I want to apologize. The source you describe as a "random unknowledgeable website" is the website of the global news agency Reuters. If you want to dispute the content sourced with it, provide coverage in a reliable source that makes the point you want to make and/or start a talk page discussion (but please do not use a mere personal opinion website as a reliable source). Best regards Hekerui (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]