User talk:Antonio Lopez/Archive6
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Antonio Lopez. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Double support
It seems you supported Huntster in his RfA twice (#19 and after #88). I've crossed out the latter. Singularity 05:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 17:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah Chris G Bot 3 is down too, I realized it when I went to the IRC. I already have a work around, thanks for the message! Antonio Lopez (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
TEST
Antonio Lopez (talk) 01:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antonio, I don't think it was a good faith edit. Take a look at the user's talk page history. This was the third test article s/he created. S/he created the very same article the day before, it was speedied and s/he deleted the nn-warn template. I see at least three warnings that s/he has removed. Usually I would have placed the nn-warn message but apparently it was not working with this user. I'm pretty careful with warnings that I place. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 11:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- I assumed it was good faith because when many new users create a user page, they accidentally create it in the article space. Antonio Lopez (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa
|
the !vote must mean you got no opposes :P Antonio Lopez (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well I would have said !vote even if I had got opposes but yes I got no opposes :) AngelOfSadness talk 16:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you for signing my signbook. :) <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 03:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- your welcome Antonio Lopez (talk) 03:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Incorrect and careless use of Huggle
You have today reverted incorrectly an entry by myself on Stephen Green (Christian Voice). Please avoid doing so again.--AltonPeter (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- no it was not, you were told that youtube is not a reliable source, plus I put a summary explaining why, that was not abuse, I'm quite careful when I revert Antonio Lopez (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it might have been a cross over to be fair, but you actually reverted after I had changed the reference away from a You Tube one. By the way, do you have a reference for the Wikipedia rule that You Tube is never reliable (I'm not arguing, but woul dlike to see it anyway)?--AltonPeter (talk) 21:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Actually there is no policy that states youtube is unreliable, the reason it is not reliable is because it may be self published, Wikipedia sources should be third party. Another reason is a person can upload videos with factual errors. There is also a copyright violations, people often upload videos with out the creators permissions Antonio Lopez (talk) 21:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it might have been a cross over to be fair, but you actually reverted after I had changed the reference away from a You Tube one. By the way, do you have a reference for the Wikipedia rule that You Tube is never reliable (I'm not arguing, but woul dlike to see it anyway)?--AltonPeter (talk) 21:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Your VandalSniper application
help ---UPDATED---
you seem in the know-how... can you make my user page look pretty? (sorry or this randomness)Thejessemancan (talk) 10:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sure I can, I just need to know your color preferences, also I'm random myself Antonio Lopez (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- thanks.. um.. these colors are nice but w/e lol... thanks for your help ;) Thejessemancan (talk) 01:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Nice! thanks a heap!Thejessemancan (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- thanks.. um.. these colors are nice but w/e lol... thanks for your help ;) Thejessemancan (talk) 01:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sure I can, I just need to know your color preferences, also I'm random myself Antonio Lopez (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 25 | 23 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 26 | 26 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)