Jump to content

User talk:Antoine1786

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello Antoine1786, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Montana Meth Project, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Montana Meth Project was changed by Antoine1786 (u) (t) deleting 21299 characters on 2009-07-01T05:28:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Hello, Antoine1786. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Montana Meth Project. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 16:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments

[edit]

Again, whenever you leave a comment on a Talk page, you should sign your comment by typing four tildes (~~~~). Whatever404 (talk) 19:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing your own comments at article Talk pages

[edit]

I have reverted your change to a comment you made at Talk:Montana Meth Project#Data and accuracy for a fourth time (three edits were yours, one was SarekOfVulcan's), for the reasons I explained in each of my three prior edit summaries. It is bad form to edit comments to which others have already replied. Editors who wish to update their statements are encouraged to use strikethrough, as outlined in WP:REDACT, a Wikipedia guideline which addresses this type of situation. If you need help or explanation, please reply here. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for choosing to work within Wikipedia's guidelines. Whatever404 (talk) 16:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References on article Talk pages

[edit]

Thank you for coming to the talk page for discussion. I just want to point out that it is better to refrain from using the <ref> tag on article Talk pages, because, unlike in article namespace, there is no References section in which those references are listed.

Also, if web versions of references are available, it is not enough to provide only the names of those references and to fail to provide the links. I can think of two reasons why:

  1. Failing to provide links dumps the work of finding those links in other people's laps. That isn't fair. If you wish to make changes, you have the burden of verifying the accuracy of the proposed changes, and substantiating the proposals with references.
  2. If you don't provide a link, how can we know that we are looking at the same document? I might find a version that is older, newer, published elsewhere or in a different way, with different page numbers, etc. Providing the links is the way to be better assured that we are looking at the same references.

Please add the appropriate links to the Talk page. See Wikipedia:LINK#Syntax for info on how to create links using Wiki markup. Thank you. Whatever404 (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]