User talk:Antiuser/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Antiuser. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello Antiuser/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lectonar 09:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Afd

Hello. There's no need to go through an afd to delete a temporary page like Christ the Redeemer (statue)/Temp, as you were the only contributor. You can tag it for speedy deletion by simply add {{db|Reason for deletion here}} and an admin will delete it. Reason given could be owner request and/or housekeeping, as it has to be a valid criteria as per WP:CSD. Regards, MartinRe 22:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. This was the first time I had to set an afd, it's sort of confusing. antiuser 22:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

No worries. Afd's are confusing to set up, but they are only needed when a discussion is required before deletion, for simple uncontested deletes (like removing a temporary page when it's finished), you can use the above process. Regards, MartinRe 22:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Now I know... I wanted to set it to speedy at first but couldn't find an explanation on how to do it on the help page. Go raibh maith agat! antiuser 23:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Wiki:pt

Olá Antiuser,

Eu reparei que está contribuir em artigos relacionados com a lusofonia e gostaria de convidá-lo para participar na Wikipédia em português, actualmente temos mais de 135 mil artigos. Sua ajuda será muito bem vinda.

Se por acaso tiver algum problema ou dúvida deixe uma mensagem na minha página de discussão.

Continue com esse bom trabalho,

Rei-artur 21:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Roupa-Nova.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Roupa-Nova.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 16:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The photo is from a press kit the band had made available to the media through their official website. No photographer was credited and I see that the site has been redesigned since the time I posted it. I have contacted their publicist to get written permission to use the file. - antiuser 17:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Antiuser. Please, notice that having permission to use the image on Wikipedia is not enough. Consider asking them for to release a picture under a free licensing, like "Creative Commons Attribution" or "Creative Commons Attribution/Sharealike". Or, if you have some picture of them you took yourself, you could release it yourseld under a free licensing. Of course, this is also valid for all of your other uploads. --Abu Badali 21:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Why is authorised use of the picture not enough? By my understanding, a press kit photo qualifies under fair use, since it was released by the artist's record label with the intent of promoting their work and image on the media. Even though I work as a designer and intellectual property issues frequently come up in my line of work, I find Wikipedia's policy regarding images very confusing... - antiuser 00:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Please, see bellow. --Abu Badali 00:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use and permissions

You stated in my talk page that obtaining permission from the copyright holder is not enough to use the image on Wikipedia. I feel an explanation on this matter is required. Is Wikipedia moving towards a "free images only" policy? Also, Wikipedia states that material obtained from a press kit qualifies as fair use in the absence of a free alternative. Thus, tagging an image that is already tagged as press material / fair use for deletion doesn't seem very coherent. - antiuser 00:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Material from press kits is ok under the fair use policy. What's not ok is "Wikipedia can use this image on it's website, but can't share this right with others." This comes from a ruling by Jimbo. The apparent "confusing" nature of Wikipedia's images policies may come from that fact that Wikipedia is not only trying to be legally safe, it's trying to build a free colletion of information (and unfree images are usually unwellcome). Best regards, --Abu Badali 00:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, this clears the permission matter up. However, I still think you're being unfair and indiscriminate with your mass-tagging of fair use images. While I understand your position and support a free Wikipedia, I believe fair use images serve a purpose and thus have their place in Wikipedia. When free alternatives of decent quality cannot be found, fair use material is allowed - as far as I know, that is still the rule. - antiuser 00:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

I did not tag any of your images for being a "fair use image". I tagged them either for lack of source information, or for not being used anywhere. --Abu Badali 01:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, the thing is, they were being used, until you removed them from the articles - so my argument stands. - antiuser 05:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The way the were being used is not allowed in Wikipedia.--Abu Badali 10:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:PaulinhoDaViola.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PaulinhoDaViola.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RadioTaxi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RadioTaxi.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Peppino di Capri.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Peppino di Capri.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Udora.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Udora.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Ira band.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ira band.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Morris albert cover.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Morris albert cover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The image is orphaned because you removed it from the article. I believe it was pertinent to the article in question and no free images were available at the time the article was posted. As far as I know, fair use is still allowed on wikipedia despite your efforts to eradicate it. While I agree that fair use should be avoided, it serves a purpose and should not be banned outright. You seem to indiscriminately tag all fair use images for deletion. Out of respect for the way Wikipedia works, I am keeping your deletion nominations and not placing the images back on the articles. - antiuser 00:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)