User talk:AntifascistFront

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Johan Bäckman. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

I see that in this edit you removed material with an edit summary which said "Absolutely non-existing link". However, the link works fine for me now. Evidently whatever the problem was when you tried the link, it has now been corrected. Also, in a case where it is likely that a once working link has now failed, it would be more helpful to tag for improvement of references, rather than simply removing the material. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit you removed a statement, with an edit summary claiming that the statement misrepresented the cited source. However, the following passage from the source does appear to support the statement which you removed:

Нюгрен отдельно подчеркнул, что Бэкман совершенно неоправданно преувеличивает реваншистские настроения и взгляды, которые высказывала некоторая часть финнов в начале 90-х годов.

Please be careful that you check sources thoroughly before taking actions such as this. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 10:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]