User talk:Antiesten

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Batman enemies in other media have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Batman enemies in other media was changed by Antiesten (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912373 on 2022-03-07T23:28:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United Arab Republic. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United Arab Republic was changed by Antiesten (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89912 on 2022-03-08T03:06:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dell, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What happens when you vandalize?

I'm not vandalizing! Antiesten (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Antiesten/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Antiesten/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antiesten! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, articles being declined might be disappointing, but it's ok. Antiesten (talk) 20:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Antiesten, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interface (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

User pages are not articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Interface and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Interface, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 00:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep spamming me with "User pages are not articles.", then I will literally mute you. But did I mute you before? Why did you text me while you were muted?! Antiesten (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2-Amino-3-carboxymuconic semialdehyde, you may be blocked from editing. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Harold Foster Hallett. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

>:( Antiesten (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Negative talking = mute Antiesten (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Rundkvist. Wikipelli ^Talk 00:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People have been trying to coach you out of your non constructive editing. You don't seem receptive. Please take in the feedback you have received and edit constructively going forward. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok first off, You are negative and you are a editor blocker.

Second, Vandilism is stupid.

If you block again from editing, I will mute you FOR ENTERNITY.>:( Antiesten (talk) 23:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to block me from editing? I don't think so! Antiesten (talk) 23:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Antiesten/sandbox

Hello, Antiesten. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Antiesten/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]