User talk:Anti Wikileaks

Blocked

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 09:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anti Wikileaks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

new name Pro NSA, do think the block was motivated by political correctness

Decline reason:

As could be inferred by your userame and has been confirmed by your post-block posts, you are apparently attempting to use Wikipedia as a platform to promote your opinion. Unless you are able to provide believable assurances to prove otherwise it is best to keep the block in place Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anti Wikileaks (talk) 12:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin; nobody who confuses WP:BLP with political correctness should be editing here. I would like to see an unblock request which addresses this discrepancy before an unblock is granted. --John (talk) 17:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I ask that John who violated Wikipedia guidelines on blocking by not discussing my chosen name ;which is not a person to be removed as an administrator. This is a clear case of someone engaged in censorship and a being a coward for refusing to discuss.Anti Wikileaks (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jezebel you also abusing admin duties. You are not supposed to do a block without discussion. I can only assume that admins are too cowardly to do whats right. therefore I will circiuumvent your block any chance I get.Anti Wikileaks (talk) 22:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]