User talk:Anti Vandal Spy
 | Have any anti-vandalism tools or scripts? Chances are, I want to use them... |
Your VandalProof Application
[edit]Dear Anti Vandal Spy,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel Bryant 01:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Misfire on Coffs Harbour, New South Wales
[edit]Can you explain this? For one thing, the article has been around since October 2002. I can see you warning the most recent vandal 124.183.178.118. But you could have also done 124.187.132.138 and 60.229.231.112.
Anyway, now you've got me worried at adding {{db-test}} to established articles with edit summary "(Requesting speedy deletion (CSD g2). using TW)". Is it as simple as hitting the wrong button or something? Shenme 03:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)