User talk:AntiDionysius/Archives/2024/August

Armored Warfare correction

Hello there. I do not know how to add references, but I recently downloaded ARMORED WARFARE and I can assure you that the current developer and publisher is "Wishlist Games". My edit is accurate, but I do not know how Wikipedia works, so can you please help me? Here is the company that has AW (Armored Warfare): https://wishlistgames.net (you will see ARMORED WARFARE on the landing page of that link! 141.237.1.220 (talk) 12:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	You stayed impressively collected while discussing such controversial topics with that IP editor. Thanks for your service! Staraction (talk | contribs) 17:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@Staraction ah, thank you, you're very kind. A wiser person than me would probably just have disengaged at some point but here we are. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

for your valuable and surely exhausting work on the Imane K article and its talk page. BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

@Bobfrombrockley thank you, it means a lot. I kind of ended up involved by chance, and then felt the need to stay involved. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Sarmatism (pseudohistory) - set up for speedy deletion

I have no time to set the entry Sarmatism (pseudohistory) up for speedy deletion. Anyhow, it has no English language sources, and what sources there are do not correspond to content. The author tried to create a concept out of nothing, it is telling the entry failed to pass on Lithuanian Wikipedia itself. It is clearly an unencyclopedic entry of no relevance, breaking WP. If you can and want to help me out in setting this up for speedy deletion, I would be thankful. 83.6.202.147 (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

English language sources are not a prerequisite for inclusion on English Wikipedia. The article would not qualify for speedy deletion; you would need to go through the Articles for Deletion process. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

>and what sources there are do not correspond to content. The author tried to create a concept out of nothing, it is telling the entry failed to pass on Lithuanian Wikipedia itself. It is clearly an unencyclopedic entry of no relevance, breaking WP. If you can and want to help me out in setting this up for speedy deletion, I would be thankful. 83.6.202.147 (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Like I said, it does not qualify for speedy deletion, and you would need to go through the Articles for Deletion process. That link explains how to do it; it's not difficult. However, until then, you should stop blanking out the page. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I would be thankful if you helped me out in that. You can clearly see it qualifies for deletion. If you have good faith, could you please help me. 83.6.202.147 (talk) 17:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I think it would be best if you did it yourself; I'm not the person who believes it should be deleted (I have zero opinion one way or the other) so I'm not really going to be able to make a case for why it should be, which a deletion nomination should do. Is there any part of the process in particular that you don't understand? AntiDionysius (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for this. I can't believe we're still having that conversation. Joyous! Noise! 23:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

No problem. It was still on my watchlist from last time. This really is getting ridiculous. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)