User talk:AntiCom88

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AntiCom88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked without reason or warning.

Decline reason:

Pick a new username and explain why you picked one closely related to white supremacy. And knock it off, we don't need to warn people who pick inappropriate usernames. Yamla (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anticom has nothing to do with white supremacists nor does me being born in 1988 AntiCom88 (talk) 17:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make a new unblock request with this as your justification. I have to warn you, though, it won't fly. --Yamla (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AntiCom88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked without warning or reason

Decline reason:

You were blocked for your username, which you already acknowledged when you attempted to defend it. You cannot edit using this username, and given your choice of username combined with your only edit, I hold zero good faith that you will be able to edit neutrally and constructively here. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AntiCom88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

made one uncontroversial comment on a talk page and was blocked and accused of being a white supremacist. I've done nothing wrong. AntiCom88 (talk) 22:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since this is going nowhere, I am declining your request and removing your talk page access. If you decide to cooperate with us and propose an acceptable username, you may use WP:UTRS for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 22:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that your username clearly means "Anti Communism", 88 is a white supremacy number, and your only edit so far has been to Antifa, this appears to be a right-wing POV pushing account. We have no need for any sort of POV pushing here on Wikipedia, be it right, left, up, or down. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.