User talk:Anti-nazi

August 2017

Your recent editing history at Martin Bormann shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 17:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your editing

(ec with above) Your account was created today, you don't know what "virulent" means ("I had to look it up"), and yet you are already WP:Edit warring with established editors over your edits. Either you're a sock of someone who has edited here before, or you are off to a really terrible start to your editing career. Slow down, discuss your disputes with other editors per WP:BRD, don't knee-jerk re-revert, 'cause it will most certainly get you into trouble.

And if you're a sock, you'll eventually be put back in the drawer, I'm certain. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Since you've just been check-user blocked, I guess you were a sock. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Are you arguing that Bormann was an atheist or not?

As you seem to have said in your first edit summary that he was an atheist, but here you wrote "Hewas not an athiest, if you think he was then "you are insufficiently educated" as you ironically told me." In any case, you can't just delete well sourced text because you don't like it or think it's wrong, find other academic sources discussing his religion and add them. Doug Weller talk 17:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)