User talk:Anti-Flag

Welcome!

Hello, Anti-Flag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 22:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tnx for help at Katyn

Tnx for the help - your efforts are appreciated. Do use the talk page if instead (or in addition to) comments in the text - they tend to attract more replies (as they are more visible). Also, I'd like to preserve the '2-level sectioning' - i.e. to have the sections below on a different level then references and external links - so maybe instead of removing the heading 'massacres' you can come up with a better name for it?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1 Preparations
2 Execution
3 Discovery
4 Cover-up
5 Revelations

I agree, I'll rather use the talk page (in that particular case, the talk page ought to be archived). I don't believe it's a good idea to treat every section as a subsection and as a result have appendix sections at a level higher than the actual article's subdivisions. I have never seen such an article and since all featured articles use the common sections, it should not be applied. Maybe you should ask those at Wikipedia:Section what they think about such a kind of segmentation and if it's conform with the guidelines and style. --Anti-Flag 21:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]