User talk:AnthroVeritas

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Catalans has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Catalans was changed by AnthroVeritas (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873979 on 2020-09-03T00:48:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Plautdietsch language, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AnthroVeritas, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AnthroVeritas! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Socking

I have blocked your opponent, BeltránSP (talk · contribs), for socking--but you need to be aware that logged-out editing is also a kind of socking, and you can get blocked for it. Please make sure you are logged in when you edit. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - edit warring

AnthroVeritas, regarding the above-mentioned dispute, in the "Genetic history of Italy" article today, you broke the three-revert-rule against edit-warring - you actually made at least nine reverts. You're lucky that BeltránSP turned out to be a sockpuppet, because reverting sock edits is one of the very few exceptions to 3RR. But you didn't know they were a sock, and had they not been, you and they both would be blocked right now for edit warring. Please be aware of this in the future, and try to follow WP:BRD, thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware of his previous vandalism on the article. But your concern is duly noted. Thank you. AnthroVeritas (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obsessive North-African/Arab genetic contribution entries on Portuguese people

Dear user:AnthroVeritas, likely in good faith; you have been engaging in disruptive, biased and obsessive input on the page, deleting previous and accurate materials and entries whilst repeatedly emphasising on what you appear to believe is of particular relevance in Portuguese genetics- Moorish contribution: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portuguese_people&action=history I recommend that you consult the WP five pillars on ie. neutrality WP:NPOV, etiquette WP:WQT, avoid editing just to make a (personal) point WP:POINTy and always observe respect towards content and other editors WP:CONDUCT. Persistent failure to comply with these, may lead to blocking and in extreme cases, banning altogether. Happy editing Melroross (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of my edits were disruptive, nor were they intended to be. They are not "biased" either. They are taken directly from the most reliable, expert studies. Everything I entered is exactly in line with the the studies by Olalde et al. and Bycroft et al., the most comprehensive genomic studies to date on native Iberian populations. Your threats of blocking are not constructive either, and nothing on that article I have entered merits that.AnthroVeritas (talk) 12:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Spaniards

added a link pointing to Berber

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula

added a link pointing to Basque Country

Normans

added a link pointing to Cauchois

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding false claims of sockpuppetry

AnthroVeritas, I don't know if you are or are not a sockpuppet of JamesOredan. I had strong suspicions seeing you are engaging in the same arguments but I sincerely hope you are not and we can discuss productively. Otherwise it would be frustrating for me to attempt finding consensus on this topic with people who are just trying to impose agendas. As you can see I have written a skeleton to discuss various different studies separately, which is the best way to go about things, in my opinion.--Php2000 (talk) 17:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a puppet of anyone, and I am not arguing anything the same as that person. In fact, I have to revert much of their vandalizing edits on several articles. Everything I am entering is taken verbatim from the respective sources being cited in the articles. AnthroVeritas (talk) 04:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I reverted your edits but Im self reverting as an act of good faith for now. Please express your views more succintly in talk page and without bold and such things.Php2000 (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]