User talk:Ante7896

Ante7896, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ante7896! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Akisho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tame (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamingpala: It was unsourced ( Original research) im only helping that is not considered vandalism. Ante7896 (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamingimpala: Ante7896 (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dir (clan). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dabaqabad (talk) 12:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shit233333334. Thank you. Dabaqabad (talk) 12:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Shit233333334 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ante7896 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand i was blocked for consistent Sockpuppetry, and Block evasion. I promise i will refrain from my behaviour, and moving forward i would like all to keep all edits on this account, I would also like a fresh start if Admins think it is necessary I am open to a break. I have no intentions of being disruptive, I just want to improve articles, and create articles I really have no intentions of doing all this, I understand I have made the wrong choice, and I promise I will always avoid Sockpuppetry. @NinjaRobotPirate:Ante7896 (talk) 10:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been so abusive, you are now considered banned by the community as per WP:3X. No admin is free to lift your block. And of course, even if you weren't banned, there's zero chance we'd lift a block on this particular account, an account literally used to continue violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: in this case I think I should go to the Arbitration Committee since no Admin can lift my ban.