User talk:Anoopkritagya

This is Anoopkritagya's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Innover Digital (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Innover Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anoopkritagya! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia beginners wanted for user testing

Wikimedia Deutschland is looking for beginner editors for user testing! We are working on some changes that may affect the editing experience, and we want to make sure that our changes don't make things more difficult for beginners. If you made less than 100 edits, we would love to hear from you! More information and a signup: https://greatquestion.co/wikimediadeutschland/4oADuQpx/apply. --Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) PS: This is a one-time message to selected beginner editors. You won't get any further notifications if you're not interested.[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Innover Digital

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Innover Digital has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anoopkritagya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fully understand Wikipedia’s guidelines, and I will ensure that I do not repeat this mistake. I plan to connect with experienced writers and editors on Wikipedia to make future changes under their guidance. Kindly consider unblocking my account, as I am passionate about contributing and striving to become a better Wikipedia writer and editor. Thank you for your consideration. Anoopkritagya (talk) 07:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Anoopkritagya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Wikipedia, I totally understand that my previous contributions were marked as promotional, and my account is marked as Spam / advertising-only account, I apologize for making such edits which have not been followed according to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, I had tried to make changes according to the previous suggestions and removed the texts which have no trusted and reliable sources to validate the article but now I know that where I am doing mistakes, I have reviewed the Wikipedia's guidelines and policies for providing the valuable information backed by the trusted and reliable sources and also the topic should be written as a neutral point of view which should not be looked like a promotional, I will make sure to add only reliable sources for the topics which is written as neutral, If I did not get any sources for the article which are not reliable and trusted, I won't be submitting them to Wikipedia. I hope this request will be considered as genuine and I will be allowed to use Wikipedia for future. Thanks! Anoopkritagya (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi Wikipedia,

I totally understand that my previous contributions were marked as promotional, and my account is marked as Spam / advertising-only account, I apologize for making such edits which have not been followed according to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, I had tried to make changes according to the previous suggestions and removed the texts which have no trusted and reliable sources to validate the article but now I know that where I am doing mistakes, I have reviewed the Wikipedia's guidelines and policies for providing the valuable information backed by the trusted and reliable sources and also the topic should be written as a neutral point of view which should not be looked like a promotional, I will make sure to add only reliable sources for the topics which is written as neutral, If I did not get any sources for the article which are not reliable and trusted, I won't be submitting them to Wikipedia. I hope this request will be considered as genuine and I will be allowed to use Wikipedia for future.  Thanks! [[User:Anoopkritagya|Anoopkritagya]] ([[User talk:Anoopkritagya#top|talk]]) 07:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi Wikipedia,

I totally understand that my previous contributions were marked as promotional, and my account is marked as Spam / advertising-only account, I apologize for making such edits which have not been followed according to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, I had tried to make changes according to the previous suggestions and removed the texts which have no trusted and reliable sources to validate the article but now I know that where I am doing mistakes, I have reviewed the Wikipedia's guidelines and policies for providing the valuable information backed by the trusted and reliable sources and also the topic should be written as a neutral point of view which should not be looked like a promotional, I will make sure to add only reliable sources for the topics which is written as neutral, If I did not get any sources for the article which are not reliable and trusted, I won't be submitting them to Wikipedia. I hope this request will be considered as genuine and I will be allowed to use Wikipedia for future.  Thanks! [[User:Anoopkritagya|Anoopkritagya]] ([[User talk:Anoopkritagya#top|talk]]) 07:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi Wikipedia,

I totally understand that my previous contributions were marked as promotional, and my account is marked as Spam / advertising-only account, I apologize for making such edits which have not been followed according to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, I had tried to make changes according to the previous suggestions and removed the texts which have no trusted and reliable sources to validate the article but now I know that where I am doing mistakes, I have reviewed the Wikipedia's guidelines and policies for providing the valuable information backed by the trusted and reliable sources and also the topic should be written as a neutral point of view which should not be looked like a promotional, I will make sure to add only reliable sources for the topics which is written as neutral, If I did not get any sources for the article which are not reliable and trusted, I won't be submitting them to Wikipedia. I hope this request will be considered as genuine and I will be allowed to use Wikipedia for future.  Thanks! [[User:Anoopkritagya|Anoopkritagya]] ([[User talk:Anoopkritagya#top|talk]]) 07:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ok, those are all good things to hear. Can you tell us about your connection to InnoverDigital? -- asilvering (talk) 01:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]