User talk:Anonymousone2
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Martin.musatov (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome!
Hello, Anonymousone2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Succinct problem, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Succinct problem
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Succinct problem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Succinct problem
[edit]A tag has been placed on Succinct problem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that succinct problem probably does warrant an article. However, lifting the abstract of a paper or a book review is not acceptable article content. An article needs to be written that explains the term and cites—but does not plagiarize—reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I agree. ArXiv should not be discriminated against or held to higher standards than the rest of the Wikipedia Community.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Suggested Usage for Succinct Problem
[edit]http://qwiki.stanford.edu/wiki/User:MartinMichaelMusatov Can we use this? I noticed several other references on the P=NP page reference Complexity Zoo which exists on this Qwiki. It is then subpar is it not?
- http://qwiki.stanford.edu/wiki/User:MartinMichaelMusatov is not an acceptable source. As a blog, it is not reliable. However, because of the licensing of the text, it would not be a copyright violation. —C.Fred (talk) 05:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Agreement
[edit]ArXiv preprints are acceptable references. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples.
Indef
[edit]Hello, I've indef blocked you, for trouble on P = NP problem (for which you would otherwise have got a 24h block for WP:3RR and for being a presumed sock Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martin.musatov. You can dispute that here if you like William M. Connolley (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)