User talk:Anonymouschild1

Speedy deletion of Ross tandet

A tag has been placed on Ross tandet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Realkyhick 15:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ross tandet, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 16:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. -Wafulz 20:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: For All I Am (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

You must provide clear sourcing/citations to show the band's significance. Please read the Notability guidelines linked in the pink box.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:For All I Am and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Anonymouschild1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: For All I Am (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Frankly this could be notable but please still add any further available in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:For All I Am and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Regal Entertainment Group— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mz7 (talk) 02:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Regal Entertainment Group with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: For All I Am (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The timeline is written like a fan magazine blurb - for an encyclopedia it must be more precise. If you mention band names, you need to say who they are, when things happened, and it all needs to be referenced. Although Alternative Press is a reliable source, I do not see any actual music reviews, only announcements of recordings and tour dates. You need actual reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:For All I Am and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Decline Notices

Please do not remove AFC decline notices or AFC comments from drafts. These note that they should not be removed while the draft is in review. Maybe you didn't notice. Now you know. It has been restored. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on For All I Am. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bakilas (talk) 06:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to For All I Am— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 07:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anonymouschild1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article For All I Am, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Bakilas (talk) 07:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bakilas - I understand. I submited this back in 2016 and it was denied due to lack of sources. I happened to use wikipedia today and was unprepared for this article to be approved which resulted in my changes. I promise I have no COI and will accept edits without authority.

"This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time."

"The timeline is written like a fan magazine blurb - for an encyclopedia it must be more precise. If you mention band names, you need to say who they are, when things happened, and it all needs to be referenced. Although Alternative Press is a reliable source, I do not see any actual music reviews, only announcements of recordings and tour dates. You need actual reviews."

Anonymouschild1 (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your understanding, I hope you enjoy your time here at Wikipedia. Please remember to sign your comments by leaving 4 tildes (~) at the end of your comment. It will automatically change into a signature, like this ---> Bakilas (talk) 07:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David.moreno72 - No problem, see above. I will review that article tomorrow and see it without any "influence". Thank you for contributing. Also, I am not familiar with the way Wiki communicates so forgive me. Anonymouschild1 (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on For All I Am

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page For All I Am, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]