User talk:Anonymous sensible

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jschnur. I noticed that you made a change to an article, South Korea, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 00:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

Hi Anonymous sensible, the content you are adding to South Korea does not appear constructive to the article. It appears to be a machine translated version from the jp wiki(?) and has been reverted in good faith again. Noom _talk ^stalk 00:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not repeat such edits. Ask assistance with translation and discuss your proposed changes at talk:South Korea first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at South Korea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anonymous sensible. You have new messages at Benlisquare's talk page.
Message added 11:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 11:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Responded again on my talkpage. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

Thank you for stopping the 'edit warring'. Please propose any changes at Talk:South Korea. William Avery (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:South Korea, is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your induction into the field of opinion assertion. I'm sorry without going through the procedure. Thank you for taking care so far. Was blocked unfortunately. Are listed in here.

Do not seem to have settled the debate with the other side. Inappropriate or is not still? "There is a deep-rooted anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea through education" Representation and propose to. --Anonymous sensible (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive edits in incomprehensible broken English. Your English is far too poor to make any useful contribution here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous sensible (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had to edit without going through the procedure.However, the procedure was to understand thanks to the person who block me.Also understand that my English is bad. There are things I must say. There is a one-sided article, it can not tolerate.

Decline reason:

It looks like you are trying to change articles on Wikipedia to more closely conform to your own political ideas, rather than to reflect what is verified in the best available sources. It appears that you do not read and write English well enough to understand the rules, which are written in English, or well enough to discuss your desired changes clearly with English speakers. There are many Wikipedias in many different languages, and no one expects you to edit all of them. It's enough to make useful edits to a Wikipedia in a language you know well. Is Japanese your native language? You'll find the Japanese Wikipedia at http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本語. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

翻訳ツールを使って訳された文章をそのまま書くのはダメです。単語がバラバラにならんだデタラメな英語しかでてきません。英語に訳したあと、それを並び替えて英文にしたうえで、さらにそれを日本語に翻訳したときにちゃんとした文章になれば合っていると思われます。残念ですが、英語Wikipediaに書き込むならそれくらいのレベルは必要なようです。それと、「韓国や北朝鮮は反日教育をしている」というのは日本人ならわかりきったことですが、それでもWikipediaはそれを書くことはできません。書き込めるのは「反日教育の現場の写真」や「それを報じた大手新聞社のニュース」「それを問題視した大学教授の論文」などです。個人サイトはもちろん、有名人のブログですらアウトです。参考までに書いておきます。 Wingwrong★ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 19:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

この人のブローケンイングリッシュを拝見するのは大変苦痛なことです。--水樹美月 (talk) 06:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]