User talk:Anonymous editor/Archive 5

Congratulations on the occasion of your 5000th edit

... and for your sound judgment and cool head, which cannot, I daresay, be adequately represented on a counter.BrandonYusufToropov 02:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 02:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats indeed! And thanks for the encouraging comments re. my signature-editing. I'm a bit embarrassed that I didn't check the Village Pump first, but I'm not yet overly familiar with the internals of wikipedia. (As you can see, my sig is still broken, despite my best efforts.) btw, sorry for mistyping your username in one of my edit comments; it's a pity these things can't be fixed. &—JEREMY 05:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hoozah! And well done! --Irishpunktom\^talk 12:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats man... Great work indeed! PassionInfinity 06:21, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Salaam, Great to know that you embraced Islam by learning it yourself. There are a lot of things that must be told to you but they will go afterwards. Can you tell me what things you find to make sense? I am impressed however and still confused why so scholarly people fail to understand the beauty of it. PassionInfinity 06:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamofascism

They are trying to reinstate this really offensive article. Can you please take a look? Yuber^(talk) 16:05, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail

I didn't get it... probably because my e-mail in my preferences said .com not .edu.... I could have sworn it was correct a while ago. Feel free to try again. gren グレン 17:58, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I got ten copies this time :D I sent a reply to see if I can reach you. gren グレン 19:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help

If you get the chance to take a look at the article on Islamofascism-- resurrected by some reactionary trolls through a parliamentary trick of some kind, I'd appreciate it.

Option A is for the article to be deleted or merged, but I'm not sure how to do that at this stage. Option B is for the page to reflect a very brief summary of the usage of the word, as opposed to, say, photographs of Nazis and Muslims palling around during WWII, which is what some people favor. BrandonYusufToropov 21:34, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, I have seen the edit warring. However not unusual for that particular group of editors.--a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote to merge and redirect Islamofascism to Neofascism and religion... ... which is where it belongs. Vote here: [1] BrandonYusufToropov 14:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voted. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 04:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed in combating vandalism

Good day,

I am an editor of the Emma Watson page, and we are having some big problems. The page is literally vandalized almost daily, and it is beginning to become a big problem. I took the iniative to post a warning to potentional vandals warning them that they could be banned if they did vandalize the page, but it did not seem to work, and it was removed because some felt it wasn't fair to single this page out as something that could ban users. I am at my wit's end with this, and we could really use your guidance about this issue. Thank you for your time, and congratulations on your 5000th edit! --D-Day 15:53, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at your talk page. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:23, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir

Hello Anon. Ahm... the article mentions Indian claims but does not mention Pakistani claims. Pakistan does claim Indian Kashmir besides the region already under its control as a part of its territory; thts basically the entire Kashmir excluding Aksai Chin and Trans-Karakoram Range. Thanks --Deepak|वार्ता 20:49, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on talk page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:16, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Black RfA

Thank you very much for your support of my RfA. Thanks, in part, to you, I am now an Administrator, and I pledge to use my newfound powers for good rather than evil. Thanks again!--Sean|Bla ck 06:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same as it ever was...

... on Jihad. Take a look... BrandonYusufToropov 13:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chaosfeary is most definitely Enviroknot. I will try to get some people to look at his account soon. Yuber^(talk) 16:27, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok good. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Check EnviroKainKabong's edit-warring on this article 29_October_2005_Delhi_bombings. Yuber^(talk) 21:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will check it soon. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:55, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for your support in the past few days! You are right to trust the nominator, Dmcdevit is one of the most intelligent and trustworthy editors in WP. If this process is succesful, I can promise you that I will do everything in my power to improve and protect the Wikipedia. I truly believe that it will be (and already is) one of the most referenced information sites on the internet. And if sucessful I will be asking trusted admins such as Dmc for their advice and direction. Thanks again for your support. Hamster Sandwich 03:50, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome and I left a message on your talk page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--

[[2]], which you may or may not consider being worth taking a stand on. BrandonYusufToropov 17:54, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at it but have no opinion right now. I am pretty neutral with it. It does sound a bit offensive though. I will think more about this still a lot of time left. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:39, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out.

I can be rather forgetfull. While I am here, I have been meaning to give you this for your conduct at your rfa and elswhere (no, I am not giving you a personal attack:-)). Sorry it is so late. Cheers Ban e s 20:49, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is my honor to award Anonymous Editor this...green cucumber with sunglasses, for being cool when the editing isnt. For always keeping a level head. *"If you can keep your head when all around you are losing theirs and blaming it on you."* **Ban e s** 20:49, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you liked it! All the best Ban e s 20:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

:) Thanks for everything. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Anonymous editor,

I would like to thank you for your support and kind words on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything, or if I ever do something wrong with my new powers, please contact me. Mushroom 17:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just thanks

Thanks!! Slrubenstein | Talk 20:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

However, if you have time to explain to me why you prefer this particular translation, and what you think are the weaknesses of the ones I mentioned, I would be very appreciateive (consider it a teaching moment). Slrubenstein | Talk 20:44, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, again, Slrubenstein | Talk 20:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What?!!!!!

5,000 edits DON'T BEAT ME!!!!!!!!! NO!!!!!!!! The edit counter is broken, damn! Congratulations though -

For getting 5,000 contributions and being a new threat in edit counts :)

Take care, I wish you would have told me : ) εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 03:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Anonymous (there's a pun there with Bosch that I will not make at this time),

Thanks for voting to support my RfA. I wasn't expecting an unopposed promotion (I thought I'd hit some die-hard edit-counters at least) and I'm touched by the trust shown in me. I'll try my best to continue to earn that trust. But first, I'll have to work on not sounding like a politician; that last sentence was awful. Oh well. Let me know when I screw something up with the shiny new buttons. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vote re Islamofascism (term) losing (term) at talk page there

Did you know about this? BrandonYusufToropov 11:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't. Voted. But still an unofficial voting area. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 16:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Still hanging on

Hi AE, thank you very much for your note, which I appreciate very much. Don't worry, you'll have to put up with me for a bit longer. ;-) Messages of support like yours make all the difference. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 13:07, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very glad :) to hear that SV. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 16:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion

See Category:Candidates for speedy deletion RedWolf 17:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Now that my RfA is fully and officially completed, I want to thank you for your support. I appreciate your confidence that I can do the job. -- SCZenz 19:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

?

He hasn't vandalised anything since the fourth warning, until then he won't be blocked. Quick question: I've asked this before (to non-admins and admins) , but are you an administrator? For some reason I've seen an RfA with your name on it. Happy editing! - Johann Wolfgang 19:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. Maybe someone should nominate you, you have over 5000 edits, and I see you just about everywhere. And thank you for the congratulations. (Everyone thought my RfA was going to fail, so nobody has really congratulated me :( ) Have a nice day! - Johann Wolfgang 20:06, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll see what I can do. - Johann Wolfgang 20:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, He's been blocked indefinitely now. See here

Thanks. See you around!

Mindmatrix scam adminship

File:CAD1000 Front.png

As fellow residents of this land, I feel it is my duty to employ my newly-granted priviliges to ensure that this politically unstable land may one day achieve a level of stability and functional governance that we all desire. To that end, please use the attached funds with the strictest confidence to accomplish this goal. (Yes, you're right, functional governance and Canadian politics is an oxymoron.) Thank you for your support. Mindmatrix 21:28, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Tool

Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Iblis, devil#islam

hey, i edited the iblis article the other day, saw that you edited it as well and also likely know a lot more about islam than me.

the edit you made seems to contradict another wikipedia article.... thought i'd bring this to your attention as you may want to set the record straight in one or the other.

Thanks for the alert, I will check it out. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BD2412's RFA

Although my RfA is not over yet, I figured that since so many people voted before it had been posted, I may as well start thanking people before it wraps up. Thank you for your support, Anonymous (whoever you really are) - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality rise to the level of the dream. BD2412 T 04:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Pakistan history section

The edited version explains things clearly. Such as the difference between the Sassanians and Safavids which is substantial as well as Hindu Rajas and the predominance of buddhism in the region. These all correspond to the History of Pakistan article as well as the other version makes no sense and the Kushans Tocharian sentence doesn't even read correctly. The Kushans are a type of Tocharians and it doesn't hurt to link them as such. Whatever your beef regarding the editing, discuss first as I don't think the other version makes as much sense. Tombseye 22:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh so you were the anon IP inserting information. Well my only beef was that much of it was redundant and repeated things about Buddhism which was simply adding to large size of the paragraph, which you were already arguing was too long. Also I changed the dates into a form that was the same in the entire paragraph. Otherwise I am okay with the paragraph. But please log in next time. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 04:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My failed RFA :)

Dear Anonymous editor,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Examples section

My only concern is the examples section which I don't think is necessary. Events like that are already mentioned on several wikipedia articles about terrorism.

Well, it seems that historically, most military jihads have been wars, not terrorist campaigns. But I will continue on Talk:Jihad. -- Beland 11:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

I agree with your version and would hate to see you be penalized, but you may be in vioaltion of the 3 block rule. If not now then really soon. Be careful. Don't let them use that against you.Gator (talk) 20:18, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See my response to your Object, Thanks. Scifiintel 20:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC) And I responded again, thanks. Scifiintel 20:29, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please relook at Jesus to see if you want to support it for featured article status. Thanks. Scifiintel 18:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Hi Anonymous,

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. It did very well and finished with a vote of 70/1/2! If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! Thank you once again! – NSLE _(T+C+CVU) 06:13, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Woops!

Sorry about that! I didn't think it was you, either... Palmiro | Talk 15:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See, you knew when you took your (admittedly cool) name ...

... that you would from time to time be held accountable for every bit of mischief perpetrated by actual anonymous editors, right? :)

By the same token, you're also responsible for every good anonymous edit on WP, eh? BYT 15:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

:-) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 15:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamofascism move

I'm not sure what should be done here - the two sides seem pretty evenly split. Maybe a wider RfC would be in order. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:44, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A consensus has not been reached. So no move. An rfc might work later but we will have to wait until this vote is closed. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with your statement is that the article was originally at Islamofascism, and was apparently moved to Islamofascism (term) without consensus, and the title itself does not follow Wikipedia convention. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I see. However other terms also have (term) beside them. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? Jayjg ^(talk) 22:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An example - American_terrorism_(term) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly a good example, since BrandonYusufToropov only moved the article to that name on December 2, in order to support the use of the title Islamofascism (term). Do you have a real example? Jayjg ^(talk) 21:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An example is an example. If I show you another one you might say the same thing. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild's successful RfA

Thanks a lot for your support on my request for adminship; it passed with 23/0/0 (plus one duplicate support and an oppose from a vandal IP). I'll do what I can to exceed everyone's expectations. ^^ // Pathoschild 19:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That from mainstream Islam to NOI, sorry i didnt see the repeats, anyway i guess we should remove the NOI ones since they no longer make sense.

Thank You

Thanks for catching and reverting the vandalism to my user page. -- JLaTondre 03:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Thanks for your recent edits. I learned something today!Gator (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for making an exception, that means a lot to me.Gator (talk) 19:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alhutch's RfA

Dear Anonymous editor,

I'm an administrator, and I've got you to thank for it! Thanks to your support, my RfA passed 25/0. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can help you with anything. See you around the wiki, :-) Alhutch 06:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Many thanks for your support during my RfA – following a 30/0/0 vote I’ve now been made an admin. Do have a Jaffa Cake! Cheers, CLW 14:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a bunch

thanks for the nice comments and the support in RfA. it's been really fun to play with my new admin tools! I think i've rolled back about 300 times in the last 12 hours! see you around the wiki, :-) Alhutch 19:01, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

129.7.35.213

Thanks for the advice. I've brought it to the attention of the admin who banned him/her earlier this month. --Lee Hunter 19:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Feel free to revert at Islamic terrorism. I'd rather avoid a head-to-head with JRM. - Tεx τ urε 21:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting; how do you know that? Jayjg ^(talk) 22:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting possibility, but the University of Houston is a big place, and the technical details do not match. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, it's possible, but you've been wrong about these things in the past. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I know it's him. I and others who have followed the user know this. Same thing happened last time. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He is still evading a simple 3rr block though. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppetry is not helpful. Kindly stop your false accusations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.7.35.102 (talk • contribs)

Mind you, the comment above does make it more likely you are correct this time. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I've blocked the range this time. I'll use even larger ranges if necessary. Blocked means blocked. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:18, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jay. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:18, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Back again as 70.230.73.20 (talk · contribs). --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was a TOR proxy - blocked permanently. It looks like you were right, it's most likely Enviroknot et al this time. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Email

For some reason I never received your email. freestylefrappe 22:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent the same one again. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:54, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is really weird.....for some reason I'm just not getting your emails. Try doing it outside of Wikipedia; danofalltrades7@hotmail.com freestylefrappe 19:03, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Enviroknot

I've blocked the IP for 48 hours. Unfortuneatly it's a shared IP at the University of Houston, so they'll be back. Maybe one of Texan Wikipedians should go down to the university, eh? :)--Sean|Bla ck 21:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I blocked the range for 48 hours just before Sean blocked the IP. Individual IP blocks don't work. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salaams

Many thanks.BYT 21:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Striver 22:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

spammer

I was going to warn him, but Jdavidb was quicker than me. regards, dab (ᛏ) 23:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC) take it easy, no-one is going to vote "keep" just because they're spammed by some anon jerk. To the contrary, rather. That said, SIIEG or no SIIEG, what's the difference? There will always be Islamophobes on WP, and they'll always be free to team up, on-site or off-site. dab (ᛏ) 23:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hosni Mubarak

(deliberate, politically motivated ommissions) 14 December 2005 69.157.233.126 13 December 2005 69.157.233.126 Mr Mubarak has escaped no fewer than six assassination attempts.[3] --The Brain 23:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know. The article needs cleaning too. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[4] --Striver 04:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for voting for me at my RFA, which closed with a 24/1/1 outcome. I will do my best in the position I now am in. Thanks again, and see you around Wikipedia!

--Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for voting on my RfA! The final result was (36/1/2), so I'm now an administrator! I'm sorry, sir, but I'm going to have to put a test3 template on your page out of pure habit. (Just kidding!) Mo0[talk] 06:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Thank you for your support. I'm now an administrator (final vote 64-2). — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 06:50, Dec. 17, 2005

My RfA

Thanks for voting on my RfA! The final result was (36/1/1), so I'm now an administrator! And I thought anonymous editors couldn't vote! :PShanel 20:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:ApeAndPig

Yes, it is an Enviroknot sockpuppet; it is from his city, using an IP provider and range he has previously used. Given that, and the editing pattern, there is no doubt. Jayjg ^(talk) 07:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jayjg. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 16:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

Hi, thanks for your support on my recent RFA. The request was successful, with a final tally of 33/0/0. I'm delighted that you decided to support it and I hope that I can live up to your expectations. Leithp (talk) 10:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ianbrown's RfA

Thanks for voting in my recent RfA. I was overwhelmed at the turnout and comments received.

Ian ≡ talk 07:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle

Thank you for your contribution to Miracle - It is much appreciated. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage Vandalism

Hi Anonymous editor,

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! :)

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 11:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Block on Yuber

It does look like the last editor was specifically created just to revert the content again, however, Yuber could have reported that instead of reverting for the fifth time. I'll make a note on AN/3RR about the sockpuppet and another admin can unblock if they disagree. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish

Okay. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since its still going on, I've protected the page. Hopefully the possible sockpuppet can be checked out and blocked. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 21:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to your question about reverting possible sockpuppets, the way I understand WP:3RR is that only self-reverts or simple vandalism can go over 3 in 24 hours. It also says "Any reversions beyond this limit should be performed by somebody else, to serve the vital purpose of showing that the community at large is in agreement over which of two competing versions is correct." While sockpuppets and revert warring by sockpuppets is highly annoying, its preferable to get others involved and report the problem. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 21:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good to see that he is temporarily blocked until sockcheck is complete. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

What makes you think the two are sockpuppets? I'm not familiar at all with Islamophobia. · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 21:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It does appear to be likely. Looks like there's some shenanigans going on with the Zatanna image also. · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 21:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes user is being very disruptive and is likely the sock of a banned user. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message Kate. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

how does one do a sioute reselutio?

Talk:Hosni Mubarak#7 Few facts answers all the questions. I wonder if some of the money/ media / corroption sould be incllluded in Gulf War of 1991 too Thanx --The Brain 23:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet check

Based on the technical evidence, it is entirely possible, but not conclusively proven, that Mistress Selina Kyle is Chaosfeary. Fones is not. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

malo's RfA

Thank you!

Anonymous editor, thanks for your support on my RFA. I was rather suprised at the overwhelming support I received. Thank you for your confidence in me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Project: Islamic education

Dear Anonym:

Assalam-o-Alaikum I have sent you an e-mail on the subject. To seek your guidance on sources and institutes of Islamic education. I am afraid the mail was drastically long. Please view and comment.

Regards, TheProphetess 14:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I replied. Thanks --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Useful message

Thanks scorpion I am very happy with my new faith. Please take concerns to BYT's page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 18:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware of that. Thanks. Scorpionman 02:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

The message was for User:Jbamb, but the link on his talk page was directed here for some reason. Sorry for the inconvenience.--216.164.147.35 00:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected to my page, but hopefully he fixes it. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year. Guettarda 18:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!

Thanks santa! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 06:24, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please check these out

Since Striver seems to be keeping a low profile, I've been able to get some work done. Check out Hijab and Abu Dharr. Oh, and Merry Christmas! Even if we're not Christians, we get to have Christmas because we're USAians! Zora 07:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The section

What's the problem with the section that I added to the article "Islam and Judaism"? Toya 15:26, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 15:30, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I knew already before that that you deleted the section that I added to the article "Islam and Judaism" because it was part of the Jewish-Arab conflict article, you wrote it in the edit summary of your deletion. But is there a problem with information which is in the section? I guess that I need to open this discussion in the talk page of the Islam and Judaism article. Thanks. Toya 16:04, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You don't believe me, right? You think that I am a fool! Great, I came out fool again! Toya 09:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Izehar's RfA

Hi anonym,

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything or if I ever do something I shouldn't have, please, don't hesitate to drop me a line. Izehar 16:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you!

Thank you, merry Christmas to you and your family! Cheers Ban e s 17:03, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi AE! Thank you for your kind support on my RfA. -- Szvest 17:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}[reply]

Help! at Sunni Islam

A militantly Shi'a Iranian editor is busy rewriting the Sunni Islam article to prove that the Shi'a are right. I've reverted once, and he has restored his extremely argumentative version. Please help, and please recruit other Sunni. This is just not fair. Zora 22:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islam and Judaism

thanks for the note, I´ve made some comments. My main original objection was to the ahistorical thesis being peddled in the deleted article. i don't feel so strongly about inserting this material into the current article, though on its own terms it's still pretty poor and should be greatly improved and sources added first. Palmiro | Talk 04:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Howcheng's RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship. I was successfully promoted with a final tally of 74/0/0. I will endeavour not to let you down. Thanks again. howch e ng {chat} 07:21, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jihad

I tried to make it easy to understand , but it seems like I have made more difficult . Plz take a look . Also see Combative jihad , may be it needs a title change . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c} 21:33, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks from Deathphoenix

Hi a.n.o.n.y.m,

I just wanted to thank you for supporting me in my RfA and for your offer of congratulations. To tell you the truth, I was surprised by all the support I've gotten. I never saw myself as more than an occasional Wiki-hobbyist.

My wife sends her curses, as Wikipedia will likely suck up more of my time. She jokingly (I think) said she was tempted to log on to Wikipedia just to vote Oppose and let everyone know that she didn't want her husband to be an admin.

I'll make sure your trust in me is founded. Just to let you know, there's Phoenix (who hasn't edited in a while), Evilphoenix (my nominator), and Phoenix2 (he's also in the Harry Potter WikiProject, so maybe this has something to do with the Order of the Phoenix?). Now we can wait for Lifephoenix, Goodphoenix, Phoenix3, and Pheonix. :-) --D e ath phoenix 15:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I was promoted with a final tally of 31/1/1. Please don't hesitate to contact me if there is anything I can assist. --BorgQueen 22:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

All the best

Thanks for the greetings. I also wish you a nice new year, and all the best. I am sure that we shall inter-act more. --Bhadani 17:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bhadani. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 17:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Anonym, just a suggestion. It is not a good idea to delete text from other talk pages or even your talk page. If the talk page gets too big, you can just archive it. I believe that's the best. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry Oleg, I just felt that as maybe I said the wrong thing before as you mentioned that it's would be useless to keep it there on your talk page. But every user has different opinion on the issue. :) Thanks --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new noticeboard

I've created Wikipedia:Islam and Judaism controversies noticeboard, I thought you might be interested. --Victim of signature fascism 19:18, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ril I will take a look at it later. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:24, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

I propose merging Islamist terrorism into Militant Islam & Dar al-Harb into Dar al Islam, please comment if you have thoughts on the matter . Thanks . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c} 21:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rfa

Szvest would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Szvest to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Anonymous editor/Archive 5 2. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Thanks svest. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 16:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welkies the most anonymous editor and person I've ever met in my life! ;) Start looking for a nice mop! Maybe this

. Cheers -- Szvest 16:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}[reply]

Thanks. Yeah I'll get busy looking for that right mop and bucket. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 16:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added already. FireFox was on the door knocking I think! -- Szvest 17:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Loool! You took it seriously! I appreciate it, thanks. Indeed, it was the same I asked for; a Burny star. ;) -- Szvest 17:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Esperanza!

Welcome, Anonymous editor/Archive 5, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. Redwolf24 runs the spam to keep members up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.

I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee comprised of FireFox, Flcelloguy. Titoxd, and Karmafist. The next set of elections will be February 28, and I would be glad to see you vote, or even consider running for a position.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work! --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 18:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 18:41, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Hopefully we at Esperanza can be a beacon of hope for all the other nonsense going on at rfc,rfar and all the assorted talk pages scattered everywhere.

I'm trying to convince the rest of the Advisors that we should have a clear bicameral governement, with the upper house being the committee and the lower house consisting of every member of Esperanza. Wikipedians, whether Esperanzan or not, have a right to a clear and tangible voice in policy creation/revision/destruction, IMO.

Anyway, thank you so much for joining our subcommunity. Please let me know if I can assist in the future. karmafist 18:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Karmafist. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for saving the Allan Ramirez page.

Youre welcome --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:05, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks! I was actually elected last time, but... thanks anyways! Flcelloguy (A note?) 04:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really

I just commented out the edit link on the main WP:RFA page, which transcludes its subpages. If you go to the subpage, you could still edit it to vote. So it's not really protected. -- Pak aran 02:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]