User talk:Anonymous User 2024

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous User 2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the last edit was done by accident and I am against vandalism and have helped to remove it for the Community and I apologize for what I did, please reconsider unblocking me, thank you very much

Decline reason:

It wasn't just your last edit, though, was it? Yamla (talk) 23:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have stated that I apologize for what I did and you are trully baised

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous User 2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the last edit was done by accident and although I know I made disruptive edits before, I strongly apologize for them and promise that I will not do it again, I have helped to remove vandalism for the Community and protected articles from it with my heart, please reconsider unblocking me because it was not deserved, and please don't review this with bais, thank you very much.

Fares

Decline reason:

I think you mean "bias", but I'm not sure what that has to do with this. This is not about a single edit. You give no assurances that your disruption will not resume nor do you describe the constructive edits you intend to make, so I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you absolutely sure you want to use your edits to Al Jazeera controversies and criticism as evidence of your constructive behaviour? Your edits there were ~~clearly abusive~~ and were reverted. If you are sure, be aware this will count against you. You've already had two unblock requests declined and are in danger of losing talk page access if your unblock requests continue to demonstrate you need to remain blocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is just wrong, my edits were not reverted and even an admin stepped in to revert what people making disruptive edits made about me, he made sure that these edits should be on the page,and you personally attacked me for nonsense and because of my identity, sadly wikipedia doesn't have an option to report admins like you --Anonymous User 2024

I have struck my statement that your edits to that article were clearly abusive. As you accurately point out, there's more to the situation than first appears. My sincere apologies for making that statement. You are welcome to note that I have struck out that part of my statement in your unblock request (but obviously aren't obligated to do so). --Yamla (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thank you for corecting your statement, I will absolutely correct mine, but I don't understand the part that you said you corrected it, I thought your statement is all about the disruptive edits on that page, could you tell me what do you mean. Also I know that I made disruptive edits before, which I absolutely regret and apologise for It and understand that it is horrible. It's you and the other admins who will decide will I get unblocked or not. Thank you, Fares

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous User 2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First, the last edit was done by accident and although I know I made disruptive edits before, I strongly apologize for them and promise that I will not do it again, and if I did you can block me. Second, I have helped to remove vandalism for the Community and protected articles from it such as the "Al Jazeera controversies and criticism" page which I spent months protecting it with my heart from misinformation and disruptive edits that try to target palestinians. Third, the admin named "Yamla" stated things that are just not true, he said that my edits on the "Aljazera Controversies and criticism" page were vandalism and that they were reverted, which is false, and even an admin named "M.bitton" standed with me and reverted those who try to remove real, unbiased, information of mine, all of this breaks the wikipedia policy and he should be reviewed by other admins. Please reconsider unblocking me because it was trully not deserved, and please don't review this with bias like Yamla did.

Decline reason:

per #Unblock discussion with blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[1] was an accident too? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

@ToBeFree: Is this adequate? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deepfriedokra, I don't think so – at least not with a very good response to my 19:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC) question. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, most of Anonymous User 2024's editing focus is covered by WP:A/I/PIA's extended confirmed restriction, as notified in [2], and simply unblocking without this having been addressed would just lead to more restriction violations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you did is violation to wikipedia policy, you are being biased with this and what you stated is not a good response, this block is politicly driven and not deserved, what does the block has to do with me editing palestine related page? I request the other admins to look at this admin and question his bias for the block because what he is doing is downright disruptive and and just hateful to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous User 2024 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]