User talk:Anonymous Editorial Help

Copyright violation?

Hi. It isn't clear what you're citing as a 'copyright violation' in regard to this edit. None of the removed content relates to any obvious violation of copyright, and the brief quotations are well within the bounds of fair use. If you are referring to the use of material from 'non-public' annual meetings as 'copyright violation', that is not correct. Even if it were the case that the material represented confidential or proprietary information (neither of which applies to identification of corporation directors), neither would automatically constitute a violation of copyright merely because the meeting were not public. As to the specific removed content aside from the incorrect removal rationale, I don't particularly care about the specific changes.--Jeffro77 Talk 10:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)