User talk:Anonimus Croatus

January 2022

Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Armed Forces of Croatia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 13:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Embraer C-390 Millennium, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Enikon T-21 Tutor

The article Enikon T-21 Tutor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability and WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onmyway22 talk 08:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

All entries of this user can be reverted, nothing is cited, and all of these are not true. Reddwarfcro (Talk) 10:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Enikon T-21 Tutor

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Enikon T-21 Tutor, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators Noticeboard Incident discussion, January 2022

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 22

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly..Slatersteven (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent unconstructive editing. In addition to other problems which have been pointed out to you, examination of your editing history shows that certainly most, and perhaps all, of the material you have posted is fictitious, indicating that your purpose in editing is to vandalise Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]