User talk:Anondoesnotforget

Welcome

Hello, Anondoesnotforget, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Contemporary anarchism have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Skomorokh 20:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism and anonymous

Yo, I am afraid that the encyclopaedia cannot go making links between contemporary anarchism and anonymous, as that is original research. The only way such an association can be included is if it has been made by a reliable source – I am not aware of any such source, do you know differently? Regards, Skomorokh 21:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: M.S Mphil Phd in Counselling and Psychotherapy

Hello Anondoesnotforget, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted M.S Mphil Phd in Counselling and Psychotherapy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. NW (Talk) 21:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Tartan Bearer

Hello Anondoesnotforget. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tartan Bearer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination of Gran Estacion Mall

Hello Anondoesnotforget, and thank you for joining the Wikipedia community. Unfortunately, I have failed your request that the article Gran Estacion Mall become a Good Article. I have given a brief summary of why on the articles talk page. I think that if you kept working and added more information, reliable sources, perhaps looking at other good articles as a guide, you might be able to get the article up to GA status. I apprieciate your boldness and I hope to see you around.

Cheers! ~Pep per 22:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also...

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. ~Pep per 22:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Ranger (Cannabis) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Black Ranger (Cannabis), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Ranger (Cannabis) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mjpresson (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

{{unblock-auto|1=209.242.130.148|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "TheArtOfTrolling". The reason given for TheArtOfTrolling's block is: "user...".|3=Nakon|4=2084669}}

Appeal from your main account. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Anondoesnotforget (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

209.242.130.148 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "TheArtOfTrolling". The reason given for TheArtOfTrolling's block is: "user...".

Blocking administrator: Nakon (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are a Confirmed sock of TheArtOfTrolling and have now been blocked directly. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. — Tiptoety ^talk 21:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed? How can you possibly confirm that? It isn't true! I shouldn't suffer because some fuck edited from my university's i.p. address at the same time as me or whatever bizarre criterion it is that you have decided upon. --Anondoesnotforget (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser data shows that you edit from the same IP, and even the same computer (useragent string). Not to mention, there are similarities in the usernames, and your userpage advocated trolling. Tiptoety ^talk 22:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I would like to see you prove anything in court. And I WILL make you prove it in court if I have to. Anondoesnotforget (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you are making legal threats, I am revoking your talk page access as per this policy -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]