User talk:Anon1002

Welcome!

Hello, Anon1002, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 18:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Please only place {{Helpme}} tags on YOUR OWN talk page, not someone else's. As for your question, I don't see how it's wrong to quote someone in any circumstance, so long as you have an actual source to back up the quote (i.e., a newspaper article, magazine, or the minutes themselves). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

helpme

{{Helpme}} I quoted and linked to the city council minutes but my writing was deleted by someone who said that city council minutes were "overkill". I don't know what to do.Anon1002 (talk) 19:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid he's right. I had a quick look on your last version and the things that got removed and they seem somewhat out of place here. I see that you've done a lot of work, putting it here with sources and all. Best would be, to contact the other editor and talk with him about the issues. Maybe some of your adds can be kept. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 19:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Helpme}} Someone is asking me to reveal my identity. I don't know what to do.Anon1002 (talk) 00:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I don't know the background to what's happened yet; I'm going to look into it. If you can summarise, please do so below. I will respond again very soon; I promise I will help you solve whatever problems you are having. Thanks! -- Chzz ► 00:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please can you show me where someone has requested your ID? -- Chzz ► 00:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I can't see what you're referring to, so I'll stop investigating now. If you need any further help with this, please ask me on my talk page, or put the {{helpme}} template back on this page, and someone will try to help. Thanks, -- Chzz ► 01:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I tried to post about zoning variances and it wouldn't let meAnon1002 (talk) 04:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not quite sure of your question; to create a page, you just go to an article that doesn't exist, such as zoning variance, and choose 'start a new page'. Type in your contribution and click 'save'. That's it! I hope this helps; if you have problems, please ask us again. Thanks, and happy editing. -- Chzz ► 04:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} What I tried to do was link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance_(land_use) to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steamboat_Springs,_Colorado It won't let meAnon1002 (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To make a link, you'd edit Variance (land use) and put in [[Steamboat springs, colorado]] in the text somewhere. The word would then be a 'wikilink' to the other article. You could put it in the 'see also', or somewhere within the article. OK? -- Chzz ► 04:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} It won't let me. I think someone is paid to keep information on zoning variances out of the article on Steamboat Springs CO. Because someone burned to death they don't want any discussion about variances. Not much that can be done with the censors Anon1002 (talk) 04:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much smaller zoning disputes are news in the New York Times^[1]Anon1002 (talk) 04:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by "it won't let me". I can see that you have made changes to the article, and only this one was changed by another user. If you disagree with their comment, "rv per WP:WEIGHT - council minutes are overkill here", please try to discuss it with them on the article talk page. If that fails, see WP:DISPUTE. Thanks, -- Chzz ► 04:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} It was a big change since "riskier" just deleted all the references. I think she is paid off to patrol certain articles and delete information. Wikipedia is just a waste of time because it allows "editors" to delete references for the purpose of keeping infor from the public. I really should never trust Wikipedia at all.Anon1002 (talk) 14:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel something is relevant, you really should discuss it in the article's talk page. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 14:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict)

I'm sorry that you feel that way. Wikipedia is just a collection of volunteers, trying to improve this information resource. Of course, there are lots of problems, but we always have to assume good faith; we don't have laws or rules, just policies, and we try to decide everything by discussing it. It works pretty well, most of the time. Of course, not everyone on wikipedia is a 'nice person', and there certainly are some people who try to abuse it to further their own aims - but there's many ways to deal with that. You can make a big difference, and I'd really encourage you to stick with it. If you have a problem with the persons edits, the first thing to do would be to speak to them - politely - about it. If that doesn't work, you can get others to help resolve the problem. Ultimately, a disruptive user can be blocked from editing.

I hope you will continue to contribute; I don't think you've asked any specific question here, but if you do have one, please ask again.

Sincere thanks for the work you've done so far - I hope you'll stay. -- Chzz ► 14:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.

Your edits to Steamboat Springs, Colorado place undo weight on the zoning issues, and appear to be pushing a particular agenda. Please remember that Wikipedia in not the news, detailed minutia of local zoning issues do not belong in an encyclopedia entry. The article already makes mention of the incident and provides addequate references to document the criticisms of the city government's actions in the section Steamboat Springs, Colorado#Controversies about government. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/nyregion/thecity/04elev.html

[1] ttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/nyregion/thecity/04elev.html

[1]