User talk:Anom8trw8

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here, and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert your name and timestamp, use (~~~~) (four tildes), or, to insert just your name, type (~~~) (three tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you may want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Good luck, have fun, and be bold! SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Cd895.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cd895.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. It was used to promote their CD players. I often light my tags too much that it bits me you-know-where later. User:Anom8trw8 (Talk) 10:33 PST, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Stop writing nonsense about Spanish

Spoken on all continents?

Your edits are vandalism. You can't add "IT IS NOT SPOKEN EVERYWHERE it is just easy to learn and cheap to visit a third world country". Anom8trw8 19:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

help!!

[[1]]

look at this craziness . i keep gettin warnings when i dont edit anything! i havent even been on wikipedia around the times most of the warnings were posted... do you know what could be goin on? thanks

i never wrote that!!!! i never been to that page >.<

ok thanks, i do have an account though, its jus annoyin wit all these messages comin up everytime i do go into wikipedia

Thanks for your contributions

I award you this barnstar of tireless contribution

the real world challenege

that cast is not confirmed. BMP will reveal it January 12 soI'm deleting it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.195.3.11 (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:All american rejects on trl.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:All american rejects on trl.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 05:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please view the new tag. Anom8trw8 19:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

You said: "Ok, first off let me apologize for my rude behavior earlier. I know that after a talk with some others that the Ciara image can't be used since it is replaceable, and that the Mel image was put up for speedy deletion (I also put up the Ciara deletion which was deleted recently). The All American Rejects photo is still being used but with the appropriate tag since it can't really be replaced since any other concert of them would have the same issue."

I took a look at the image you mention and I agree in principle, but you do need to establish on the image page why it is important to depict them in concert. We can not use this image simply to illustrate what they look like, it must add meaningfully to the article. To take an example, Madonna is (or at least was) known for her extremely racey concerts. It would be reasonable to have an image from a concert attached to a paragraph discussing this fact (though I have no idea of this is the case with the article on Wikipedia right now). On the other hand, it would not be appropriate to have a fair-use image of the All American Rejects being used solely for illustrative purposes. If you don't see the difference between these two cases, please let me know. And apology accepted. Everyone violates Wikipedia policy from time to time and I certainly won't hold it against you. --Yamla 19:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Please note that the claims made above are incorrect. I have not examined even a significant fraction of the last 100 contributions from this user and absolutely nothing before then, as far as I can recall. Second, as has been pointed out to this user, the ciara image may not be used solely to depict Ciara, a living person, as per WP:FU. See criteria #1 and counterexample #8. Even if it could (which it can't), you can not remove a no-rationale tag from an image until the rationale is provided. Doing so is considered vandalism and the user was warned about this. The tag provides a week for the user to add the rationale before the image is removed. As to point #2, I simply have no idea what the user is talking about. AAR? What does that stand for? What image is being discussed? And for point 3, what point is being made? That I noted the image was missing additional information? How is that an attack on the user? As to the point about t.v. screenshots, I have repeatedly pointed the user to WP:FU. That other images also violate Wikipedia policy is not an excuse to remove the tags from other images. Also, please note that creating a new account to get around a block is abusive behaviour (see WP:SOCK), and a threat to do so makes it harder to assume good faith. --Yamla 05:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note also this user has claimed that t.v. shows are not copyrighted, or that portions of a t.v. show are not copyrighted. This is not the case. It is possible that a t.v. show may use some portion of non-copyrighted material, but then the source of the image would not be the t.v. show but the original provider of the information. Additionally, the license would no longer be tv-screenshot. In the case of the t.v. shows in question, however, no evidence has been provided that the t.v. show in question used outside, uncopyrighted, content. Concert footage would be copyrighted, for example. Finally, WP:FU very clearly states that fair-use images may not be used to depict living people, as has been pointed out over and over again to this user. --Yamla 05:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you didn't exam my last contributons is definitely a lie. I bet there's a one in a millionth chance you looked up Mel Peachey and AAR (All American Rejects) images on random. The Mel Peachey tag is the same one for the Ciara image so basically you also had a problem that it was a TV screenshot. I explained the tags to the images do NOT violate Wikipedia policy. Specifically All American Rejects on TRL. And with the Ciara image, it is for identification. I could name HUNDREDS of articles with TV screenshots of people that were taken from TV of people on their article. I know that it's not illegal to put Christina Aguilera's taped concerts or her "Dirrty" music video on her profile, so same goes for Ciara.

You do realise that your contributions are a matter of public record? Can you provide a single edit of yours older than the newest 100 contributions which I have examined? If not, I will thank you for not calling me a lier. That hundreds of Wikipedia articles have violations of policy is reason for you to mark the violating images with the appropriate tag, not an excuse for you to remove these tags from images you have uploaded. --Yamla 06:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And with new account, I am assuming good faith. I'm trying to explain these to you and why I think they are fair use, but instead you decide to block me so I can't explain my side of the image. Anom8trw8 06:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you create a new account, you will be in violation of WP:SOCK. Please refrain from such abuses. You were warned not to remove tags from images and that this constituted vandalism. You continued to do so and were blocked for this. --Yamla 06:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note also this user has claimed that t.v. shows are not copyrighted, or that portions of a t.v. show are not copyrighted. This is not the case. It is possible that a t.v. show may use some portion of non-copyrighted material, but then the source of the image would not be the t.v. show but the original provider of the information. Additionally, the license would no longer be tv-screenshot.

If THAT were the case, it would mean that I created the image, so why would it matter for copyright. If what you are saying is that the portions of these shows aren't copyrighted means that the image is for the holder of the work, I. AM. THE. HOLDER. Anom8trw8 06:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand how you come to this false conclusion. I am not claiming there are portions of the t.v. show with non-copyrighted material, though I'll admit this is a possibility. But even if there were, your taking a screenshot of this does not make you the original provider. In the interest of minimising conflict, I will not respond to any more comments for a number of hours. --Yamla 06:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concerts are not copyrighted. Period. Ciara is singing. There is no provider of her voice or whatever you are trying to explain. If Ciara were on Roomraiders, then it likely wouldn't be possible to upload that. However, since it's a concert, it's the same thing as me driving to LA and taking a photo of her (or their for AAR) performance. Anom8trw8 06:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken. Please read Copyright. Public performances are most definitely copyrighted. --Yamla 15:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Christina aguilera tell me.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Christina aguilera tell me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Turnmeon.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Turnmeon.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hood hop promo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hood hop promo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bottledfrapp.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bottledfrapp.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 07:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bottledfrapp.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bottledfrapp.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 07:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bottledfrapp.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bottledfrapp.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Koch Records artists

I have nominated Category:Koch Records artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:E1 Music artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 17:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parental control logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parental control logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Oro valley map.JPG

The file File:Oro valley map.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Marana arizona.JPG

The file File:Marana arizona.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]