User talk:AnniePJordan

This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany,_SUNY/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(8W1_Spring_2019) .

You have an overdue training assignment.

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 11:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AnniePJordan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anne's Peer Review

Clear structure is present via bullet points that can be made into sentences then added to the source
could add details from Ming Dynasty to complete imperial period (Not just Qing)
neutral content throughout- no bias statements
sources are reliable but short, could use a longer source to find even more details on topic
not sure what would be used as a lead sections solely on bulleted points
all information is of importance in showing the issue of female suicides and their caused during late imperial China
slight redundancy between sources but I think it is because of the topic itself being specifically to female suicide
within the Wikipedia page itself, I believe sections are already well organized
I would think just added information to each paragraph already present will increase the article
currently, the legality and demographics sections are much greater than the history section
information should be added to those sections most
no view point is trying to be convinced on based on the article
sources were found using databases which shows credibility of the sources
Overall, I think you are on a good path to add information to the article of good credibility and I would suggest when finding additional sources, that you look more into not just historical information but try to find examples regarding other sections of the Wikipedia such as the legality and demographics to help create a better balance among sections. --Heylee dooley (talk) 20:33, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Additional training module

Hi! I saw that you're editing on the topic of suicide. This is something that falls into the realm of health, medicine, and psychology so I need you to take this training module, as there are certain guidelines that are specific to these topic areas. Thanks! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]